You aren't reading what I said very carefully, or you're still stuck in "I'm debating skeptics" mode. I'm not saying their experiences aren't valid. That's not my point at all. My point is that you have no means whatsoever of evaluating their experiences, because they are personal. What you are evaluating is a second-hand account of an experience which you cannot possibly relate to unless you yourself had an NDE. It can only be evidence if you yourself had an NDE and thus had some way to compare their conceptual retelling to your direct experience.
"Trying to induce an NDE is dangerous of course. Why do you even suggest that? Do you want to come near death?"
I have no interest in assessing the truth about NDEs, so no.Statistics: Posted by Franc28 — 18 Jun 2009, 13:22
]]>