First things first. . . 90% of what he's going to say will be found in the Dale Carnegie books as well as Science of Mind and various aspects of basic psychology. Sorry, but snake oil is still snake oil and this "self-help" type jazz typically helps only one person; the dude selling the shit. I was in it with Terry Cole-Whitaker, Louise Hay, Tony Robbins and a myriad of others over the years including the most recent incarnation THE SECRET, which is nearly word for word what Hay & Marianne Williamson taught, just with the accent on "attraction" vs. "self-creation".
Yes, I am judging a book by its cover; I've been around this stuff for far too many years to not have this particular reflex. I am a professional Psychic, after all and a former Carney and Public Speaker, Team Building and all that other related jazz e.g. I'm a skeptic whenever anyone offers a magic pill that will fix it all for you . . . no such thing exists. What does exist are the statistics. . .
Typically you'll see a big evangelic styled start-up such as we see in Winston's hype; there will be a truck load of folks that read the first book and maybe the second who have had their lives transformed. This placebo effect is normal and unless the author of this elixir follows through with more bread crumbs, fewer than 10% of those that started will still be actively using the tools six months later. Tony Robbins has all kinds of Challenge Weekends and courses for advancement each costing a few thousand dollars more than the first and suckers willingly cough it up because, like a high school pep rally, it jazzes them up and helps them accept a sense of new confidence -- its proactive psychology; you walked across the hot coals without fear so you can do anything. . . you jumped out of a perfectly good aircraft so you can do more . . . the list goes on and on. Tony makes millions a year because he understood how to perpetuate the hype and use that energy as a vehicle that serves him and his personal goals -- to get filthy freak'n rich.
This is the same sort of thing L. Ron Hubbard exploited when he wrote Dianetics and the whole Scientology concept. . . which was a bar bet initially. Yet, it is likewise a CULT and depending on who you're talking to, it may very well be a dangerous predatory cult. Not all such fellowships are "dark" but at their heart, they are manipulative money grabbing machines that bring homage to one key figure or worse, a book
I can only extend a word of warning for anyone taking a curious venture into this material; make certain you keep grounded and not overly lured in with what is offered. A lot of it will seem logical and practical as well as viable -- it is! It's been taught for centuries by philosophers, mystics and prophets but it's still the same thing, can't change that. Understand though, someone is exploiting these things and in turn exploiting YOU. So please don't get into the ritual of buying more and more stuff and getting sucked into a potentially dangerous situation. Just evaluate the following and do so regularly. . .
Internal Control: Amount of internal political and social power exercised by leader(s) over members; lack of clearly defined organizational rights for members.
External Control: Amount of external political and social influence desired or obtained; emphasis on directing members’ external political and social behavior.
Wisdom/Knowledge Claimed by leader(s); amount of infallibility declared or implied about decisions or doctrinal/scriptural interpretations; number and degree of unverified and/or unverifiable credentials claimed.
Wisdom/Knowledge Credited to leader(s) by members; amount of trust in decisions or doctrinal/scriptural interpretations made by leader(s); amount of hostility by members towards internal or external critics and/or towards verification efforts.
Dogma: Rigidity of reality concepts taught; amount of doctrinal inflexibility or “fundamentalism;” hostility towards relativism and situationalism.
Recruiting: Emphasis put on attracting new members; amount of proselytizing; requirement for all members to bring in new ones.
Front Groups: Number of subsidiary groups using different names from that of main group, especially when connections are hidden.
Wealth: Amount of money and/or property desired or obtained by group; emphasis on members’ donations; economic lifestyle of leader(s) compared to ordinary members.
Sexual Manipulation of members by leader(s) of non-tantric groups; amount of control exercised over sexuality of members in terms of sexual orientation, behavior, and/or choice of partners.
Sexual Favoritism: Advancement or preferential treatment dependent upon sexual activity with the leader(s) of non-tantric groups.
Censorship: Amount of control over members’ access to outside opinions on group, its doctrines or leader(s).
Dropout Control: Intensity of efforts directed at preventing or returning dropouts.
Violence: Amount of approval when used by or for the group, its doctrines or leader(s).
Paranoia: Amount of fear concerning real or imagined enemies; exaggeration of perceived power of opponents; prevalence of conspiracy theories.
Grimness: Amount of disapproval concerning jokes about the group, its doctrines or its leader(s).
Surrender of Will: Amount of emphasis on members not having to be responsible for personal decisions; degree of individual disempowerment created by the group, its doctrines or its leader(s).
Hypocrisy: amount of approval for actions which the group officially considers immoral or unethical, when done by or for the group, its doctrines or leader(s); willingness to violate the group’s declared principles for political, psychological, social, economic, military, or other gain.
I have used this guide for close to 30 years now, when I speak to groups about potentially Dangerous Cults, how they operate and how to identify the shysters starting such things up. As I said earlier, I don't know for certain where things stand but in my experience if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck. . . well, chances are pretty darn strong that it is a duck. 
Statistics: Posted by Craig Browning — 25 Sep 2012, 19:22
]]>