and this:
And it kind of makes you think, surely these are all manufactured lies, surely the educated, upstanding, respectable medical professionals wouldn't condone this kind of thing? And surely Big Pharma wouldn't allow funding for projects to be witheld or cross there palms with dollars/pounds to 'expand' there medical professionals opinion on vaccinations/medication/treatments. Surely there must be a register of interest somewhere that contained details of all medical professionals who receive 'external gratuity funding' for there professional opinion/work?
And whoa be tide they condone anything not subjected to rigorous clinical trials of medicines/vaccines/treatments that are usually all or partly funded by the manufacturer of said medicines/vaccines/treatments. Hmmmn $100 miilion a year off of sales of a medicine/vaccine/treatment from the only monopoly sorry company to produce it, shareholders get big bonuses or rigorous clinical trial fails it and we all go home penniless.
But then I hold fast to the Scientific Principles we have and I hypothesised all this. A doctor of medical science wouldn't lie to me?Statistics: Posted by yellowlawn — 18 Nov 2009, 08:15
]]>