Statistics: Posted by jacksdosen — 07 Feb 2012, 23:31
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
This means that Doctor doesn't have a clue what the hell he's treating. Case closed.
Statistics: Posted by ProfWag — 03 Jul 2010, 18:09
]]>
]]>
Is this what you skeptics call critical thinking? lol
He treated AIDS paitents. Do you know what this means? It means people who
have AIDS.
Here, let me put in big letters for you of what the article says:
So what does that say, the doctor is saying he treated patients who had AIDS. The actual disease called AIDS. You know....
like.... people who have AIDS. Patient + AIDS = AIDS patient. Do you want me to use a digram or something?
Any normal person can follow what the article says.
1. Dr Shantakumar believes the Ayurvedic disease Rajayskhma is AIDS.
2. He believes that he can use the Ayurvedic treatment for Rajayshma against AIDS
3. He treats AIDS patients(i.e., patients with AIDS) using Ayurvedic treatment for Rajaykshma
By the way Ninjapuppy was not agreeing with you. She was pointing out that there is indeed a reference in the
article that the patient was tested for HIV.
Prowag, is English your first language?
Statistics: Posted by Indigo Child — 03 Jul 2010, 07:24
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>