]]>
XD
Oh, Bob Lazar....I bought some pitch blende from unitednuclear a few weeks back
See the thing is, you have to take the total number of people involved, and then you have to factor in the rate of schizophrenia among people of that population, which is about 1/100 in normal people, let's say 1000 people involved, so 10 schizophrenics in that group, give or take. Most will be on medication, but, a few will slip through the cracks, and we would expect purely by change to have 1-3 people who worked on the program totally making crap up.
Statistics: Posted by NucleicAcid — 08 May 2010, 04:16
]]>
Statistics: Posted by ProfWag — 08 May 2010, 03:58
]]>
To say that the moon landings were a hoax is to directly imply that Big Red was pulling punches on the USA.
Of course, you could say that lizards just orchestrated the whole thing, Cold War and all....
One of my school's alumni, George M Low, was the manager of the Apollo missions, and as such, there is a small museum dedicated to him in the building, also dedicated to him. Quite the hullabaloo. I'm pretty sure we have moon rocks, too.
It's not just 3 people that experienced the moon landings. Hundreds (thousands?) of engineers and scientists had to design all the rockets, spacecraft, landers, suits, everything really, plus all the management and higher ups, and the people controlling the funding. ALL of those people would have to keep quiet.
Plus, we definitely built the Saturn V rockets and blasted them into orbit, those certainly weren't faked - all that effort, just to go around the moon and come back? It's like that episode of Tiny Toons where they go to Happy World Land just to ride the monorail. Yeah, okay.
It's honestly pretty ridiculous once you start looking at all the details carefully.
Statistics: Posted by NucleicAcid — 08 May 2010, 03:49
]]>
Ask Craig about his Navy days or ask me about my Iraq days. I'm fairly certain that we don't have a lot of information that would be considered earth shattering (I know I don't at least), but we'd still have to think before we speak.
Nothing all that unusual.
I am anxious to hear more about your moon landing hoax theories.
There are some pretty sharp people on here that would probably be able to explain many of the questions you have, whether it supports a conspiracy or not. I think we all want the truth since it is out there...
Statistics: Posted by ProfWag — 08 May 2010, 03:09
]]>
The reason we are in low earth orbit efforts right now is that the spacecraft of choice has been the shuttle and it can't go to the moon despite the efforts of Hollywood to show otherwise. The idea has been to put people into a long term residence in space.
I've met people from NASA and NASA contractors as well. They work under NDAs, non-disclosure agreements. These are normal, everyday business contracts.
The moon buggies remained on the moon. They were not brought back. One of the buggies that did not go to the moon is on display at the Smithsonian. The moon mission gets tested all of the time. There are reflectors on the moon that have been used for years to measure the distance to the moon. That data has been used to obtain very accurate information on the moon's orbit.
Anyways, definitely a hearty welcome. Its excellent to get someone here that has spent more time looking over the hoax claims that I have.
Statistics: Posted by Nostradamus — 08 May 2010, 01:22
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>