Former professor of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University, Dr. Judy Wood discussed how the destruction of buildings in NYC on 9-11 was the result of directed energy technology, not planes, fire, thermite or bombs. In her book, Where Did the Towers Go?, she focuses on physical evidence, and has not speculated on whether the US government was involved in the attacks. The official story of the Towers' "pancaking" down, and the lack of subsequent debris doesn't fit with the explanation of fire, or even theorized controlled demolitions, she said. And "planes cannot turn buildings into powder in midair and leave no remains," she added.
She cited the exactitude of the damage-- the 47-story Building 7 collapsed, but the Post Office across the street "didn't get a scratch on it." And a police car had abrupt boundaries of damage-- the front half melted, while the back half appeared untouched-- "fire doesn't do that," she noted.
From her studies, Wood concluded that a kind of (weaponized) free energy technology was employed in the WTC attacks, similar to the Hutchison Effect or Tesla technology. Tesla had wanted to share this technology 100 years ago, but was afraid it would be used for evil, she commented. She described the technology as a "magnetic electro-gravitic nuclear reaction" that interferes with energy fields, and suggested it might have also been used in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.
Statistics: Posted by Scepcop — 18 May 2012, 17:03
]]>
Part of the thermite claims also comes from the dust analysis work as ProfWag has pointed out. The analysis does not look at materials, but of element lists. The buildings were full of aluminum and iron. The buildings also contained gypsum in the form of wallboard. Gypsum is a sulfur containing compound. So thermite becomes thermate.
Part of the thermite claims might also originate from the so-called missing energy claims. In these claims people compare the volume of the dust clouds to the volumes of the buildings. Then the ideal gas law is applied to see how much energy must be used to see this sort of expansion. This involves a number of horrible assumptions and improperly used formulas to obtain a result that is trivial to refute.
Part of the thermite claims also might originate from the the lack of explosions in the collapse. Nanothermite is used to explain away the lack of explosions heard in other controlled demolitions.
Statistics: Posted by Nostradamus — 16 Nov 2009, 13:13
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
The label for this photo is: This mass of fused coins was recovered from the debris of the World Trade Center.
Statistics: Posted by Nostradamus — 30 Oct 2009, 11:33
]]>
Statistics: Posted by Nostradamus — 30 Oct 2009, 10:08
]]>
Title: A chunk of melted metal and glass found in the rubble after the 9/11 attacks
Whatever it is is unlikely to be steel. There is glass in the second piece.
Statistics: Posted by Nostradamus — 30 Oct 2009, 09:58
]]>
Statistics: Posted by Nostradamus — 30 Oct 2009, 09:52
]]>
Now here is the alteration.
Notice how the man's face is also altered.
Statistics: Posted by Nostradamus — 30 Oct 2009, 09:48
]]>
This is the famous hot spot NASA image next to the one taken a week later. And we have been told that these hot spots lasted for weeks. This is from Judy Wood.
Statistics: Posted by Nostradamus — 30 Oct 2009, 09:44
]]>
The original image.
I understand that Steve Jones no longer uses this version of the same photo to claim molten steel.
Title once used by Jones: Workers evidently peering into the hot “core” under the WTC rubble.
Statistics: Posted by Nostradamus — 30 Oct 2009, 09:37
]]>
We'll begin with the class shot of the hot metal which is so often described as being molten.
Statistics: Posted by Nostradamus — 30 Oct 2009, 09:31
]]>
]]>