Statistics: Posted by Scepcop — 06 May 2011, 23:13
]]>
]]>
if they are the ones that find out and make public a real paranormal stunt
too bad they havent found it yet.. just a bunch of baboons and loonies
i cant even thinkthe amount of money
they´ll get..
is so much money in publicity, promotion..
right now JREF is almost broke
a shame that fighting the good cause doesnt get you any money
Statistics: Posted by ciscop — 09 Apr 2010, 09:22
]]>
Let's face it, if the MDC finds a winner there is a lot of money to be made and I bet a million dollars is the tip of the iceberg. That goes for the winner and the folks offering up the MDC.
Statistics: Posted by Nostradamus — 09 Apr 2010, 09:06
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
It's not specifically macro-PK, but it's a easily measurable effect. I've already discussed the effect of the width of the stasis field (the technique used), and while glass 4 was the specific target, it affected nearby targets, with the effect decreasing as a function of distance (exactly what he expected for that setup).
Effect is f(1,5) = 19.37, p < .05
Some more macro PK in tighter conditions:
And I've already posted this one, but it's worth doing again.
And just for contrast to show that controls really don't make a difference, here's a few videos that are under tighter controls, but are still totally fake:
My whole point here is that it doesn't matter what video I present, one could always argue, "Oh, it's fake." Ergo, if you're going to ask for a video that I think is real, you have to trust that at least that the videos I've selected are ones that I know are not deliberately faked, else it doesn't matter WHAT I present.
Statistics: Posted by NucleicAcid — 08 Apr 2010, 23:39
]]>
]]>
]]>