Skeptics, a question for you. If the official 9/11 story is a cut and dried case, then why do the media have to censor his testimony like that? Is that right to you? Is that truth and objectivity to you?
Here is his real testimony:
Here is the one that the news media edited out to hide the part about the explosions coming from the basement occurring before the plane struck.
Statistics: Posted by Scepcop — 13 Aug 2009, 04:42
]]>