I don't believe we had the capability of landing 6 missions on the moon successfully and returning with no major cockups or loss of life, with 7 years development time and 1960s technology, where Apollo 1 wasn't ready 2 years out from the deadline and US-designed rockets regularly failed on the launchpad with dire results. (The Russians were making better rockets with a buttress design, and not assembling them vertically to wheel out as an act of grand theatre.) Science and engineering just isn't that good, it wasn't then and it isn't now. Plus all the other objections already raised on numerous threads.
It's clear in the footage and the still photos that the cameras were often in the 'sun' for lengthy periods. The evidence is clear. It just happens that the 'sun' was just a studio light.
Your view of the NASA guy lying through his teeth not being a problem with the official story is extremely illuminating about yourself and the sort of moebius strip logic the pseudosceps get caught up in.Statistics: Posted by SydneyPSIder — 05 Feb 2013, 21:11
]]>