One of the main problems for the bigfoot believers is that after decades and decades they have no real evidence of the creature. No scat, blood, hair, or other body samples have been found. Ecological studies do not show the existence of any large unknown mammals in the ecosystems where people are looking.
I know bear researchers and they place wires in the woods to collect hair samples. The wires are like barbed wire. The collected hair is used for DNA testing to count the number of individuals in an area. No unknown mammal DNA has ever shown up in one of these studies which are carried out across the country.
In a funny story some bigfoot seekers placed a trap to collect blood. They got some blood on their board with nails in it. Sounds horrific doesn't it? They can't use that in Gitmo can they? Anyways after samples were sent to a half dozen labs finally they got a result they liked - could not be identified. So there was proof that something unidentified existed. Well, actually the report stated something about the contamination of the sample with rust made the blood sample unusable. It was painful enough to think of stepping on a clean nail, but to step on a filthy nail that's downright cruel. Don't worry, another lab identified human blood in the sample they were provided. So someone and not something apparently stepped on the rusty nail.Statistics: Posted by Nostradamus — 27 Feb 2010, 00:50
]]>