No-planes is such a stupid claim.
There were planes and they did not pose a significant danger to another plane. They posed a danger to stationary targets.
Why did Bush say he had seen the first 'plane' crash?
20 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Why did Bush say he had seen the first 'plane' crash?No-planes is such a stupid claim.
There were planes and they did not pose a significant danger to another plane. They posed a danger to stationary targets. Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: Why did Bush say he had seen the first 'plane' crash?To the rest of the readers of this thread it is quite obvious that the president and his security service were as aware of the rest of us that planes were being used to target fixed structures. It was also clear that it was civilian aircraft being used as missiles. I was alerted to something wrong in time to see the second plane impact WTC.
It was clear that stationary targets were being sought out. The president's location on the ground was known. It was a stationary target. So the safest thing to do is to get the president in motion to reduce the risk. Fairly obvious risk assessment and response. Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: Why did Bush say he had seen the first 'plane' crash?Well now! As much fun as it's been to watch you two exchange such awe inspiring thoughts. This thread is now locked.
Move along people. There's nothing to see here. All the inappropriate content has been removed.
20 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests |
|