Would JREF be worth having after proof has been provided ? Who would the skeptics hound then ?
I PREDICTED MASSIVE CHANGE, CONTROLLED CHANGE.
Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Would JREF stand down after Paranormal ProofWould JREF be worth having after proof has been provided ? Who would the skeptics hound then ?
I PREDICTED MASSIVE CHANGE, CONTROLLED CHANGE. Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proofi think they would stand down ON THAT TOPIC
just by proving something you cant generalize right? by example if esp exists and is prooved then you cant go and said bigfoot and fairies and mediums exist so much bunk in this world For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
That's correct, proving one thing doesn't prove the others, BUT it then would create alot doubt in the ''hardline skeptics''. For Example; if I proved that I could read Michael Shermer's mind , then Michael Shermer would close his site called the ''Skeptic Society''. Yet if I read Shermer's mind, it still wouldn't prove that Telekinesis exists to the Scientific Genius' of the World. Yet there would be a huge influx of doubt injected into the academic minds of all fields of Science, Especially Medicine. Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proofyep
but for what i have seen skeptics can be relaxed if all paranormalist have is retarded guys like koenig, scam artists, dellusional people and guys that just want to hang to the fame of randi.. is really a safe bet for jref Last edited by ciscop on Sun Aug 09, 2009 1:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
Would you like to see the paranormal ? Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proofyeah of course!!!
i would love it !! thats why i hang around.. i love the paranormal mostly is only stories, but i like the stories, i like how people think i have said it so many times the best kind of paranormal for me would be the psychic stuff (not speaking to the death.. more likely power of the mind) telekinesis, reading minds, esp, predicting future, telepathy.. whatever but all i have seen so far is bad science and quacks For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
Telekinesis would be the the best demonstration to end the debate. If I was to show off Telekinesis, then my fee could be a Billion Dollars and Royalties. And if people wanted to see me use Levitational Telekinesis, then One Trillion USA Dollars would be fair plus Royalties. Remember that an actual official joint scientific recording of Telekinesis would change the Entire Earth. Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
One wonders then why you are currently poised behind your computer, instead of out raking in some of that cash.
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
I don't understand your reply, could you please elaborate. Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proofso... do you have telekinesis powers?
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
I told you how it is. Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
You Ozz give the impression that the Governments of the World would leave a Teek Man go about his business. I tell you that the Governments would have that ''Teek Man'' arrested for fear of him being a security risk to the NWO Elite. Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to JREF / Randi Challenge Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 4 guests |
|