ATT: ESP Non-believers, please participate.

[quantumparanormal]

If you do not believe in ESP, please continue reading the following. We are conducting a precognition (i.e., "knowing" future events beforehand) experiment, but only ESP non-believers are wanted. If you do not believe that phenomena such as precognition are possible, we would like for you to participate in this experiment. It's simple: You will be presented 5 "zener" cards. You will then click on whichever you "feel" will occur in the future. After doing so, a randomly selected card will be displayed.

To participate, please follow this URL:

Please feel free to pass the preceding link/URL around to those whom you believe would like to participate and are also ESP non-believers.

Please, only non-believers in ESP need participate.

Thanks,

Mike

[brett]

ummm- may be a silly question but why only NON believers ?? - surly this is skewing any results ?? and proving WHAT exactly ??

please to explain your methodology and reason for using non believers - are you then going to run a trial using ONLY believers and compare the results ??

[ciscop]

quantum
after the first experiment
i started selecting the one before image
it never appeared
i did it over 10 times, not sure if its totally random or the software never counts the one before image
or i just dont have esp

by the way
on the first one to boost up your data you should use
square, star, circle, cross, wavy lines
thats the way uri geller does it
and there´s like a 40% chance people will chose the star (i shoud know this since i have it on my mentalism´s business card and do the trick on daily basis)

[quantumparanormal]

[brett]

please feel free to ignore my perfectly valid question

[quantumparanormal]

[quantumparanormal]

[ciscop]

i dont know anything about the hypotesis
but im thinking ¨non believers show less % of hits than believers¨ right?
i know you cant answer it, no problem

now.. this is what i am saying about the pictures
after the 1st ¨guess¨ (which i didnt get)
i started selecting the previous image
and i never got one hit
lets suppose on test 2 it was a star
then on test 3 i chosed a star and it was a wavy lines
on test 4 i chosed wavy lines and it was a circle
and i did it like that for 10 times
not getting one hit at all
by pure chance shouldnt i get at least once?
maybe not. i am a not believer so it should be expected that i have no esp.. the irony.. i love it, this saturday i performed for 200 people doing routines based on esp and remote viewing
i guess i should stick to only doing this with my marked zenner cards

[quantumparanormal]

[ciscop]

all the good luck for you
what i dont get is why is not an ending to the test?.. like doing 10 trials or 5 minutes to guess as many as you can..

is gonna be interesting whatever you find
i wonder if the star is going to be the most chosen ¨target¨
(i know it only works when is on the 2nd position of the alignment)

[quantumparanormal]

[ciscop]

.

[quantumparanormal]

[ciscop]

well good luck with your findings
i would really appretiate if you can share at the end of the experiment¨which was the symbol that was guessed the most¨ and ¨which is the position people selected the most¨. not sure if the software gives you that info, i am just curious

have a good one

[Scepcop]

I also don't tend to do well in such trials. But then again, getting consistently LESS than chance over many trials also defies the odds.

It's kind of like when you play Keno in Las Vegas or Reno, and you pick a certain amount of numbers while the computers picks others, the more correct you guess, the more money you win. However, if you pick a lot of numbers, and none of them match the computer's numbers, or only a few, you also win money. I almost won 500 dollars one time by scoring too little matches. If I had picked the first number I wanted to, instead of changing my mind about it, I would have won it. But I went with my second instinct and chose another number and only won 10 dollars instead of 500. Damn.

Quantum, what if a participant only does 5 or 10 trials? Would that skew your results? Does it matter how many people are involved in 1000 trials, for example?