Questions for the 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists (CTs)

[NinjaPuppy]

[Nostradamus]

Doesn't anyone look at the film of the first plane impacting?

[ProfWag]

[Nostradamus]

I always wondered why the no planers didn't use the first impact. At least some of them claim that the government added the images of the planes to the videos. Guess that wouldn't work with film.

It is weird that they don't take a stand on the Pentagon. I guess it's the voluminous evidence against them that forces the head in sand maneuver.

[NinjaPuppy]

[Nostradamus]

I cannot explain it, but I will look for a great video in which the no-planer stands by his story.

[highflyertoo]

Cover ups have been happening for many thousands of years, so why all the disbelief about USA Government contributing to 9/11 deaths?

Profwagg should give the information that ''he says'' is availible to prove 9/11 had NO USA GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT.

How does Profwagg get to see confiscated film footage and classified documents?

[ProfWag]

[Nostradamus]

[ProfWag]

[ProfWag]

I got another reply from A&E 911 for Truth (or whatever the hell they call themselves)!!!!!

From their "official e-mail person" Justin Keogh (I made up that title)

"The explosives are for "shock and awe" effect. If it was just jets hitting buildings the emotional shock of the nation would be much less.

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:54 AM, profwag wrote:

Thank you so much for the reply! I'm still finding it hard to believe that terrorists coordinated with someone to blow up the buildings as if they knew they were going to fly into buildings, what would be the need for explosives? However, I do appreciate your honest reply and it helped clarify your stance."

May I simply add, unbelievable response that pisses me off about them even more.

[NinjaPuppy]

[ProfWag]

[NinjaPuppy]

[ProfWag]