MUST SEE on 9/11 anniversary! Film w/multiple smoking guns!

[Scepcop]

Hi all,
For this year's anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, I urge you to see this new groundbreaking film called "National Security Alert" made by the Citizen Investigation Team (www.citizeninvestigationteam.com). It is very professional, contains easy to follow animation and graphics, and contains multiple smoking guns which prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the official Pentagon Crash Story of 9/11 cannot be true, no way in hell.

Watch it here. It's only 81 minutes and very compelling.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o

The evidence it presents from 5 vantage points is ROCK SOLID and I challenge anyone to try to refute it. In it, multiple eyewitnesses to AA77 flying overhead are interviewed, who were standing from 5 vantage points:

1. The Navy Annex
2. The Citgo Gas Station
3. Arlington National Cemetary
4. The Heliport Tower
5. a side street in an industrial complex nearby

Yet they all UNANIMOUSLY agree that the plane flew overhead on a trajectory north of the Citgo Gas Station, in direct contradiction to the NTSB's official trajectory of AA77 which was south of the gas station, according to the downed light poles. They all even drew on a map the trajectory they saw it flying through. And all of them drew a path that put the plane on the north side of the Citgo station.

Many of them said they were 100 percent sure where they saw the plane fly and two Pentagon police officers said they would "bet their life on it" too! Furthermore, a Pentagon police officer said he saw the plane fly AWAY from the Pentagon after the explosion!

That's HUGE! And irrefutable too!

Near the end, they interviewed the cab driver whose car got hit by the first downed light pole by AA77 (according to the official story). After a while of fidgeting and changing his story, he finally indirectly admitted (while he thought he was off camera but really wasn't) that the incident was "faked" and "planned". It was very revealing.

Anyhow, if you are evidence based and fact based and have an open objective mind, rather than a religious faith based belief in authority or a fear of challenging authority, this film will shock you and change your view of 9/11.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o

Especially if you watch it in conjunction with "9/11 Blueprint for Truth" by Architect Richard Gage, founder of AE911Truth.org, in which he gives a 2 hour professional presentation where he uses the process of the Scientific Method to show that all the features of the collapse of the WTC and Building 7 on 9/11 fit the "controlled demolition hypothesis" and not the "official fire induced hypothesis".

Here's the link to watch it:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 6903609314

As of now, 800 architects and engineers have endorsed this film and signed the petition for a new 9/11 investigation. You can see their full names, credentials and statements at these links:

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/engineers.html
http://www6.ae911truth.org/supporters.php?g=_AES_

That's HUGE! (of course) Do you think 800 architects and engineers would endorse something that's BS? No way!

In addition, many highly experienced and decorated Airline and Air Force Pilots have publicly stated that the maneuvers of AA77 on 9/11 are aerodynamically impossible, and that amateur pilots cannot fly a 757 like that, and that the captain of AA77, Chuck Burlingame, would NEVER have given up the controls to hijackers (as the passenger phone calls from AA77 claimed he did) regardless of whether they had bombs or not, which Burlingame's family has publicly concurred with. See their full names and statements here:

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/pilots.html

For more info on the Pentagon Crash, or "Pentacon" as they now call it, see these sites:

http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com
http://www.thepentacon.com

[Scepcop]

A great article about the film "National Security Alert":

http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voi ... show-monst

Independent Investigation Into Pentagon Attack Yields Alarming Information
August 30th, 2009 7:42 AM Print

PRLog



Witness flight path vs official flight path

Researchers present new eyewitness testimony which they say proves the government's story to be a "monstrous lie"

A three year independent investigation into the September 11, 2001 attack on the Pentagon has yielded new eyewitness evidence which, according to the Southern California-based researchers who conducted the investigation, "conclusively (and unfortunately) establishes as a historical fact that the violence which took place in Arlington that day was not the result of a surprise attack by suicide hijackers, but rather a military black operation involving a carefully planned and skillfully executed deception."

They have compiled the most pertinent testimony into an 81 minute video presentation entitled National Security Alert, which has earned the respect and praise of a growing number of distinguished academics, journalists, writers, entertainers, pilots, and military personnel.

The investigation involved multiple trips to the scene of the crime in Arlington, Virginia, close scrutiny of all official and unofficial data related to the event, and, most importantly, first-person interviews with dozens of eyewitnesses, many of which were conducted and filmed in the exact locations from which they witnessed the plane that allegedly struck the building that day. It was primarily conducted by two men named Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis, also known as Citizen Investigation Team, or CIT.

"There were a growing number of people in the United States and around the world who were suspicious of the government's story about what had happened at the Pentagon that day," Ranke explains. "The doubts were initially fueled by the dubious damage to the building, which seemed incompatible with a 757 crash, the deliberate lack of transparency by the authorities, and many other issues, but they really intensified after a team of professional pilots (Pilots for 9/11 Truth) analyzed the data obtained from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) via a Freedom of Information Act request in 2006, which was supposedly from the black box of American Airlines Flight 77, and found that the last reported altitude of the plane was far too high to have struck the light poles or the building. This meant that either the plane did not cause the observed physical damage, that the government had released fraudulent data, or both."

"We were tired of the cover-up, but we were also frustrated with the dead-end theorizing that was taking place", says Marquis of the project's genesis. "We knew that the only way we were ever going to know what had really happened was if we actually went to the area, knocked on doors, and interviewed everyday people about what they saw."


NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT from Citizen Investigation Team on Vimeo.

When these eyewitness accounts are aggregated, they paint a very disturbing picture, say the researchers.

"To put it as concisely as possible, the plane had to have flown on a very specific flight path in the final seconds before it reached the Pentagon in order to have caused the observed damage, starting with the light poles that were photographed on the ground and ending with the directional damage to the building itself which was outlined in detail by the American Society of Civil Engineers," explains Ranke. "The government claims the plane flew on this flight path and hit the building. The eyewitnesses in all of the most critical vantage points, on the other hand, independently, unanimously, and unequivocally report a drastically different flight path, proving that the plane absolutely could not have hit the light poles or the building. It is a non-controversial scientific fact that a strike from this trajectory would have caused a very different damage path."

It wasn't just witnesses who watched the plane approach the building that the team spoke with, however.

"We've also published our interview with a Pentagon police officer who saw the plane flying away from the Pentagon immediately after the explosion", says Marquis. "We already knew that the plane could not have hit based on the testimony of the witnesses on the other side of the building who watched it approach, but it was still vindicating to get this kind of confirmation."

A 2006 Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll found that "More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East." Nevertheless, Ranke and Marquis acknowledge it is still quite controversial to claim, as they do, that "criminal elements within the U.S. government" were complicit in the attacks.

"If you are skeptical of (or even incensed by) this statement we do not blame you," reads a note on the front page of their website, CitizenInvestigationTeam.com. "We are not asking you to take our word for it, nor do we want you to do that. We want you to view the evidence and see with your own eyes that this is the case. We want you to hear it directly from the eyewitnesses who were there, just as we did."

Many people seem to be taking them up on this offer. Their video has already received almost 70,000 views online since it was first posted to their website a few weeks ago with only a grass roots promotional effort behind it.

Perhaps more notable than the size of the audience, however, is the caliber of some of the people in it. A newly-published compendium of endorsements on the CitizenInvestigationTeam.com website includes praise from a wide array of distinguished and well-respected Americans.

Emmy-award winning actor and former president of The Screen actors Guild, Ed Asner, calls the film a "reasoned, and methodical look at witness testimony the day the Pentagon was attacked on Sept. 11th".

Prolific non-ficition author Dr. Peter Dale Scott, Professor Emeritus of the University of California, Berkeley affirms that the film "successfully rebuts the official account of Flight 77's flight path on 9/11 as it approached the Pentagon".

"If you accept the placement of the plane as independently and unanimously reported by the witnesses presented in CIT's video National Security Alert, science proves that it did not cause the physical damage at the Pentagon on 9/11/2001", says FAA certified pilot Robert Balsamo.

Dr. David Ray Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé and many other titles, says he is "pleased to be able to recommend this important film with enthusiasm", while scholar, author, and radio host Dr. Kevin Barrett says that the film proves "that the official version of the attack on the Pentagon is false, and that the attack must have been a deceptive military operation, not the kamakaze crash of a hijacked commercial jet."

Scott McKinsey, an award-winning network television director, says "The DVD offers no theorizing or speculation; only corroborated eyewitness evidence contradicting the official flight data to support an overwhelming argument that a plane did not slam into the Pentagon on 9/11".

Architect Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org), a coalition of over 700 professional architects and engineers calling for a new independent investigation of the destruction of the three skyscrapers in New York on 9/11 (the third was World Trade Center 7), calls the film "long overdue, but worth waiting for" and says that it "deserves serious attention".

Retired Navy Commander and aviator James R. Compton calls National Security Alert "the best reporting I've seen in a long, long time" and "a must see for every citizen in our country".

"Government and media figures who dare ignore evidence this conclusive do so at their own peril", warns Lt. Col. Shelton Lankford, a retired Marine pilot who has flown 303 combat missions.

The full quotes from these individuals and others can be read at here.

National Security Alert can be viewed for free online here.