Would Randi take a Lie Detector Test?

[Azrael]

[Hellboy]

[Azrael]

[Hellboy]

[highflyertoo]

I think Jeff Wagg should sit a Lie Detector Test conducted by an independent board of Scientists at a Science Convention as a ''novelty game'' between lectures , so they could say how Scientific or Not so Scientific a LDT really is.

Remember how Jeff Wagg did a MDC test to see if the woman could make him urinate, So sitting a LDT would be nothing unusual for Jeff Wagg the Science man.

[ciscop]

actually that would be cool
i recomend putting it in next to a boot of phrenology and crystal therapy

[highflyertoo]

This may come as a ''surprize'' to Jon Donnis and Prof Wag.... Rupert Sheldrake see's the Lie Detector Test as having scientific credibility.

Yes folks, Rupert Sheldrake is a Scientist and a real Skeptic. He's the Real Deal

[ProfWag]

[quantumparanormal]

Lie detectors aren't admissible in our courts as evidence. That's because they can be duped. My understanding is you have to believe it works for it to work.

[highflyertoo]

[ProfWag]

[highflyertoo]

So now you ProfWag are saying my thread is not to Trash Randi when I was suggesting James should take the Lie Detector Test?

You are now therefore lying ProfWag.

In future complain to the management through the correct channels rather than using my thread as a platform

[ProfWag]

[highflyertoo]

[ProfWag]

My research has led me to conclude that the MDC is quite legitimate. I believe there may be a thread out there trashing it, but I'm not going to go there. If you want to start another one, go ahead. I think it's silly though. Too many other more important things to follow and research. I won't even look into the police tape thing. I have no personal interest in that at all.