Hi
I cannot exactly remember how I came across your website, but I am intrigued with the content of the debates here.
I'm not exactly sure how I would classify myself. First of all I think a classification is only necessary for people on the far end of every debate.
The skeptic label in my opinion should only be applied to people that fail to recognize anything beyond science, and the same goes for believers i.e. not recognizing anything that science proved (I am using the term 'science' very casually but I am sure everyone will understand what I mean).
Currently I am an atheist, but I am always open to the existence of a god of some form and I classify any paranormal event with proper proof as something which science does not fully understand yet. I will never immediately attribute a paranormal event to something mystical, nor will I immediately dismiss the existence of such phenomena as 'woo'.
One of my pet hates is so called alternative healing. The reason for this is that I am losing a loved one because she was convinced by her homeopath that he could cure her instead of having a brain tumor removed by a proper western medical doctor. As far as I know there is no proof that any of it actually has more of an affect than a placebo (but I guess this is not the place to go into it in detail).
I also believe that human beings are constantly evolving to adapt to their circumstances and that perhaps many unexplained phenomena can be attributed to this.
Anyway, that is more than enough of an introduction.
I look forward to speaking to you all in the forums.
Regards