JFK 50TH Anniversary

[SydneyPSIder]

[SydneyPSIder]

[ProfWag]

A couple notes to your post Syd. 3 shots in 5.6 seconds is as wrong as it can be. Try closer to 9 seconds. Whomever has said less than 6 seconds is just plain wrong. ALL of the evidence points to the 3 shots being much, much longer than 6 seconds. Here is a fact that is always overlooked by CTers. Zapruder stopped filming as the limo made the turn. He did this as developing is expensive and he wanted to save film. The total time between shots cannot be determined by analysis of the Zapruder film. As such, the length of time for all 3 shots cannot be accurately determined and could only be determined if we knew exactly when the first shot was fired. Now, the length of time between the 2nd and 3rd shots can and this length of time which was close to 4 seconds can be determined, but for some reason, unbeknownst to me, conspiracy theorists always use that length of time as the entire sequence of events. They are wrong and by continuing post from conspiracy theory websites rather than from unbiased sources will continue to be wrong. I beg of you Syd, look at unbiased information.
Second, and this is extremely important that shows a major flaw in your argument, since the early days of the 20th Century, rifles do not produce smoke, especially after only a couple firings. Some will produce a little after several repeated firings due to heat and dirt build up, but even then, the smoke dissipates quickly. This isn't the movies, this is real life and if you don't believe me about the smoke, feel free to go out to the firing range or stop by your local gun dealership and ask for ammo that produces smoke for every bullet fired. You'll actually look like a fool if you were to ask for it.

[SydneyPSIder]

[SydneyPSIder]

[ProfWag]

[SydneyPSIder]

[ProfWag]

[SydneyPSIder]

[ProfWag]

[NinjaPuppy]

[ProfWag]

Thank you for the definition Ninja. There are still theories that are based on fact and fiction. It's great to have theories about things and we definitely need to investigate theories, but theories should be based on truthful evidence and not false imagination, IMHO.

[SydneyPSIder]

[SydneyPSIder]

hmm, very crooked stuff indeed -- recommend watching the segment starting at 28:43

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2agPurqFJk#t=1723

Based on the obvious creation and tendering of clearly fake photos of the wound, contradicted by the zapruder footage and numerous eyewitness, elements inside the govt clearly were involved in covering up an assassination. Interesting also that JFK's brain had 'gone missing' or been all but entirely removed before the official autopsy -- evidence which would have shown bullet trails and fragments of bullets. And govt officials had raced the body out of the hospital in Dallas over the objections of the local coroner. All highly irregular. And the 'official' autopsy was done by non-forensic non-experts from the Navy who'd never done one in their lives before.

The whole series is worth watching of course. There's little doubt the same crew of govt fakers happily went on to delude us about the success of the Apollo space program and indeed their successors have perpetrated the 9/11 scam and others.



Further, there were 3 eyewitnesses to 2 men at the grassy knoll, including seeing a puff of smoke, and a gun being disassembled and placed in a toolbox. One witness was a railway employee working in the observation tower who testified he saw 2 men, then died in a mysterious car accident 2 years later. Another was a young serviceman filming who felt a bullet whiz by his ear, and was accosted by a man with a gun who took his film. The third was a deaf and dumb man who saw the gun being disassembled and placed in a toolbox and taken away -- who tried to report it to the FBI, and was offered money by them not to testify. Both are still alive at the time of the doco and repeat what they saw at 12:34 and elsewhere:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LbNWUNfnaA#t=754

[ProfWag]