So we talked before about the Harvard ESP study (they found no evidence that ESP existed)
http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/c ... e-esp-real
also Prof Wag found that NAS says there is no evidence in the past 130 years to supports believe in ESP
http://www.nasonline.org/
i was wondering
what Believers think of this study
it was printed in yoga magazine proving Telepathy and i found it in Dean Radin.com
http://www.deanradin.com/papers/IntJYog ... 203406.pdf
SCEPCOP Forum
Scientific Committee to Evaluate PseudoSkeptic Criticism of the Paranormal
Telepathy experiment *Edit
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Telepathy experiment *Edit
Last edited by ciscop on 14 Aug 2009, 22:39, edited 3 times in total.
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Telepathy (skeptics please stay away)
It looks like I'm going to have some time to check out your links and give this some thought. I've skimmed this information but have not had the proper time to really sit down and pay full attention. I'm still trying to aquaint myself with much of the links, studies, topics etc. I look forward to it. Thanks for posting this discussion.
Re: Telepathy (skeptics please stay away)
Also... I'm curious as to why you specifically request that "skeptics please stay away?" IMO, you tend to lean toward the skeptical side yourself.
Re: Telepathy (skeptics please stay away)
 because this is a study thats is in favor of telepathy which is something paranormal and it comes from a link from dean radin so i wanted to get the believer´s side i cant tell you right ahead i dont believe in the study and have my reasons, but i want to see what the other side thinks i want to see if you can get to the same conclusions that i got when i read the study two sides, two perspectives or one perspective.. thats what i wonder For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Telepathy (skeptics please stay away)
Re: Telepathy (skeptics please stay away)
i just didnt want dean radin trashed before there was a debate
but maybe i should change the subject to avoid that For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Telepathy experiment *Edit
OK, your first link says it doesn't exist.
The second link takes me to the home page but not to any particular article. And last but not least, I don't really understand the third link (article) as it's over my head. Oh well..... I tried.
Re: Telepathy experiment *Edit
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Telepathy experiment *Edit
OK, new link works.
The title, "Neuroimaging fails to demonstrate ESP is real", is obviously accurate. But no more convincing than "Toaster oven fails to demonstrate that it proves global warming". IMO, it doesn't indicate that ESP isn't possible. Just that neuroimaging isn't the way to prove it exists.
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Psychic Phenomena / ESP / Telepathy Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests |
|
