Jarrah White - The Leading Expert in the Moon Hoax Debate

[Edx]

So its been several days now and still no response from Winston. What a surprise.

Anyone want to take bets that if he does reply he'll ignore everything I said and post another video of cut and paste from another website?

[Scepcop]

Hi all,
Check out this interview with Jarrah White, the world's leading expert on the Moon Hoax Theory. It's 2 hours long but you can see how Jarrah has mastered the debate. He knows thousands of arguments both for and against the Moon Hoax Theory and seems to have memorized them all to the point where he can easily pull out the right cards that refute any opposing arguments. The guy is brilliant and when you listen to him, you will not imagine anyone who knows more about this debate than him. He's studied it more than anyone else has, considering that he has now made over 300 high quality videos about the Moon Hoax Theory since 2006, which is more than anyone ever has.

Here is his recent interview.

YouTube version:

Part 1 of 10



Download here:

http://binnallofamerica.com/boaa051611.html

Jarrah also has a new website he is working on which he announced in the interview. It is not ready yet, but you can bookmark it for now and check back later. The URL is:

http://www.moonfaker.com

He is also a contributing editor on http://www.moonmovie.com

[ProfWag]

[Arouet]

[Scepcop]

Arouet is right. Jarrah's credentials is that he is the most knowledgeable person in the world in the Moon Hoax Debate, and has produced more videos on it than anyone ever has, thus he is the record holder of that. lol

What credentials could top that? lol

Jarrah can kick anyone's ass in this subject. Even Phil Plait ran away from Jarrah like a scared animal, cause deep down, Phil Plait knows that his conformist mindset cannot possibly compete with a freethinking knowledgeable mindset like that of Jarrah White. That's why Plait ran away in fear, cause deep down, he knows the truth is NOT on his side. When the truth is on your side, you have no fear of an investigation and you have no fear of critical inquiry.

Think about it. If the truth was on Phil Plait's side, he would have no problem sitting down with Jarrah and answering his questions calmingly and rationally.

I have no problem sitting down and answering all questions put to me, for example. Why not?

[ProfWag]

[Arouet]

[ProfWag]

[Edx]

[Craig Browning]

I'm honestly shocked this forum still exists given how the majority of the active members blast the hell out of the site's founder and owner. I guess Winston could be viewed as a good sport that's willing to tolerate (ignore?) such situations. At the same time, I simply cannot understand why he won't at least attempt to stand-up for himself

[really?]

I agree he's a good sport. I wonder too why he won't stand-up for himself.

[Arouet]

Winston is a good sport, and I've given him kudos on JREF for that very thing. It is quite frustrating though his approach of launching a discussion and then abandoning it.

[Scepcop]

Btw, this interview with Jarrah White on Whispers Radio is better cause he presents more evidence in it rather than just discussing his personal feelings like in the new interview. If you haven't listened to it yet, here is the link:

http://www.whispersradio.com/?p=176

Also, in 2001, Fox aired a TV special called "Did we land on the moon?" which makes a lot of compelling arguments and evidence that the moon landing might have been a hoax. It is exciting and only 45 minutes long. You can see it here:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 561633304#

So far, none of the Apollo defenders have truly refuted these compelling arguments. Instead, they either confuse you with pseudo techno babble, or they use insults and ad hominem attacks to call anyone who believes that the moon landings were faked, must be a nut. But Occam's Razor, which says that the simplest explanation is usually the correct one, says that these overly complicated explanations to try to discredit the hoax evidence, are probably not true, whereas the simple easy-to-understand evidence pointing to a hoax are more likely to be true. Watch the documentary and see for yourself. It contains a lot of compelling points from different experts and researchers.

NASA, on the other hand, refuses to address these arguments, but instead runs away and ignores them. Logic says that if truth were on NASA's side, then they would have nothing to hide and would be glad to answer all questions fully and logically. But they don't. They'd rather ignore any skeptics or call them nutcases. But this is no surprise, for in general, the US government does NOT engage in debates with freethinkers, critical thinkers, and truth seekers who are able to think for themselves and apply real critical thinking, probably because it does not want to give credence to them, and also because it knows that it cannot win in debates with freethinkers, if the truth is not on their side.

[Scepcop]

I do not run from questions or issues. I answer them, but I do not engage in endless circles with no point except ad hominem attacks.

[Eternally Learning]