I can do telepathy EASY! - NSA

[ProfWag]

[G. ADAM]

I never, never, never proposed a guess the number test.

You SELECT A NUMBER, *****AND***** TELE-ASK me that question.

THEN I will tell you your psychic answer BLIND.

THEN I will WORK OUT what number you selected.

You've all quoted AND TELE-ASK THE QUESTION and in the same post said NO QUESTIONS, JUST NUMBERS.

[Arouet]

[G. ADAM]

[Arouet]

[G. ADAM]

[Arouet]

Uh, no. I said I'd do that one. I'm assuming tele-ask just means I think of the question and "send" it to you.

You give me a list of 100 numbered questions. I'm willing to pick questions using a random number generator and think the question at you for a few minutes. I think the others are willing to do that too. What I'm not willing to do is come up with a question and have you answer it by picking random pages of a book.

[G. ADAM]

So now you will TELE-ASK a question but only by doing nothing.

You refuse to post 2 random numbers to me so I can answer the question because it's 'magic'?

That's you sticking point?

You said SHOW ME THE PARANORMAL EXPERIMENTS AND I WILL ASSESS THEM OPENLY.

But only if people DONT DO ANY MUMBO JUMBO 8 BALL MAGIC NONSENSE!

Riiiiight!

You Sir are a Con!

[Arouet]

[G. ADAM]

Ok that's my claim that if you direct me to a quote it will answer your question blind.

You claim it's not testable because it's subjective, but the actual reason you won't test it is because it's 'magic 8 ball nonsense'.

Your objection is a cyclic argument, you say the claim is invalid because there is no objective protocol, then you claim the protocol is invalid because the power in the claim won't work.

I KNOW you offered to guess a number you are thinking of and you will tell me if I'm right, like I've said 10 times NO THANKYOU

If you have nothing constructive to add RE: Testing Bibliomancy then don't bother me further.

NO MORE GUESSING NAKED NUMBERS REQUESTS PLEASE

[Arouet]

[G. ADAM]

How do you deduce the test protocol is subjective?

You say it's objective if you THINK of the question, and subjective if you POST a random line number to me to tele-ask it?

What's the difference? I guess the number you selected either way.

[G. ADAM]

JUST FORGET IT!

Arouet hasn't answered a single question directly yet.

I've made 10,000 posts arguing with skeptics to give me a test for 10 years!

You all refuse to tele-ask me a question to see how good my answer is!

Then I end up in 20 pages of debate with no end in sight.

It's not going anywhere, skeptics will always deceive you out of any paranormal test. It's in their nature.

I didn't apply for a debating competition, this place is no different to the dozen skeptics hangouts.

Call me quitter, troll, fake, mental, etc. etc. but I made my claim to answer questions blind, and 1 week later not 1 question from anyone.

I've been asking for someone to ask me a question for 10 years! NO TAKERS! GAME OVER!

[derrida]

[G. ADAM]

p160 l22 <<for you to find out>>


Helps if you only ask me the page and line number, anyone can make up an answer. Keep your question in your head!

What is objectivity if all words are rejected.