9/11 debate on C2C I consulted on for Richard Gage

[stundie]

[Edx]

Chemist,

Gage has been told all this before, even one of his own to him telling him he was wrong, and then left AE911.

I've argued with Winston on the Zeitgeist Movement many times and he has seen many debates I've had with others there. He doesnt care if he is wrong, when I shown him he'll disappear for several weeks then come back and post the same stuff as if he hasn't been told any different.

[Edx]

[Chemist]

Edx,
I understand completely. I've been arguing and debating with these people for years.

But, I still want to give some advice. If they expect to perform well in the debate, there are some things they need to address. They'll continue to be a laughing stock if they don't.

There are still some questions that I asked Winston back in 2009 that he hasn't answered. For the record, I'm asking them again.

There's a part of me that thinks they don't realize how flimsy their case is.

[Edx]

[Edx]

[really?]

Why is it only the fringe people that support this. You'd think that all six network tv news Fox, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC plus all other US news agencies would report on this if there was anything to it. Why not ? Let- me- guess; it's because they are all part of the conspiracy. I find the Truther conspiracy repugnant.

[stundie]

[stundie]

[stundie]

[Edx]

[Edx]

[ProfWag]

The bottom line is that it is crystal clear how the buildings fell. There is simply no other evidence presented that contradicts weakened structures collapsing. The videos and testimony of the buildings burning is extremely clear. As Edx suggested, anyone who claims otherwise is not looking at the evidence objectively. I don't blame people for not trusting the US government. Hell I don't. But from the testimony of the terrorists themselves, to the videos, to the firemen, to the lack of any other evidence, to suggest it was anything other than jihad against America is just plain ridiculous.

[really?]

[ProfWag]