OMG .. the Homeopaths are Coming!!!

[Nostradamus]

This reminds me of the frauds attempting to prop up pyramid power. They fell back on misrepresenting experiments done 150 years earlier that were poorly done.

[Nostradamus]

As far as Darwin is concerned can you show that he succussed his solution. Of course, because he thought homeopathy was wrong.

[Kevin Kane]

[Kevin Kane]

I did Nostradamus' research for him. Since he doesn't know how the internet works and can't work the little buttons and stuff.


Blog with a lot of links to homeopathy studies .... most links are to PubMed (NIH.gov)

http://homeopathytorrents.blogspot.com/ ... tific.html

Most of these trials or studies were done by homeopaths, college branches (alternative/complimentary medicine), hospital wings, institutes, etc, since that's who usually tests homeopathic medicine, perfectly legitimate and many are prestigious .... but .... I've chosen some offbeat ones that are not aligned with such institutions.


All positive.


Connecticut Facial Plastic Surgery, Farmington, Conn, USA.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... d_RVDocSum

Institute of Physiology, Biochemistry and Animal Hygiene, University of Bonn, Germany.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... d_RVDocSum

Research Institute, Miami Children's Hospital, Florida
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... d_RVDocSum

Department of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... d_RVDocSum

Department of Zoology, University of Kalyani, India.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... d_RVDocSum

Department of Surgery and Obstetrics, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Iraq.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... d_RVDocSum



Reviews showing institutional bias against homeopathy, or flawed negative studies.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15955254

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1884574/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16338200

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16319808

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19371564

[Nostradamus]

[Nostradamus]

[Nostradamus]

[NinjaPuppy]

[Nostradamus]

[Kevin Kane]

[Kevin Kane]

[ProfWag]

[Nostradamus]

[Nostradamus]

So far I have examined the first 2 articles you posted. I scanned through much of article 1. I wanted to see what they did in image processing and what they did was very simple. The conclusion they drew does not claim any efficacy of homeopathy. The second article was an in vitro study. I was not able to access that article from home. I doubt you read that article either.

I will go through your post and check out each article one at a time. If the rest of the articles are like the first 2 articles in your list, then you have NOT posted any support for homeopathy.

If you think I was mistaken on either article 1 or 2 then read the articles and tell me where in the articles you think I have made a mistake.

The score is now 0-2. The posted articles do NOT support the efficacy of homeopathy.

[Nostradamus]

Study 3 is titled: Investigation of cytokine expression in human leukocyte cultures with two immune-modulatory homeopathic preparations.

This is an in vitro study showing that low concentrations of materials can elicit a response. This article does not demonstrate the efficacy of homeopathy.

The score stands at 0-3 with no articles supporting the efficacy of homeopathy.