I think we can safely saying at this point you are beyond reason lol
So far I have cited two maths sources which have confirmed the probability
of heads or tails on any trial is 50%. You say it isn't. If you're a mathmatician,
I am an astronaut
Anyway you long lost the debate with me pal. Do yourself a favour read a book
on probability(maths), quantum physics(physics) and philosophy of science(philosophy)
In short get an education.
If you are actually going to be prove me wrong and actually show me you are capable of
being reasonable then stop with the ceaseless adhominems, and actually engage the
arguments. There are 3 arguments we have looked at so far, which I have backed by
strong argument.
1) The argument of induction to show that earth like planets have life
2) The teleological argument that shows that the function of earth like planets is to support life
3) The probability argument that shows that it impossible that no other planet would have life in the universe.
Here is what you need to show.
1) You need to show my induction is invalid and remain consistent with other inductions you accept as valid(gravity, mind)
2) You need to show how it can be at all possible to have coherence between organic matter, inorganic matter and mind, and
disprove studies which show that ones biology actually transforms in relation to ones environment(epigenetics)
3) You need to show why it is reasonable to accept and take seriously the idea that Earth, out of a estimated 40 billion
trillion planets would be the only planet to have life on it.