Simple questions on UFO

[Misha]

[Misha]

[SydneyPSIder]

[Misha]

Also, Arouet. Please find this quote made by me. It is in quotes, correct?

"I've got all this evidence of so-and-so but I'm not going to tell you 'cause its top secret"

[SydneyPSIder]

I can't find a convenient reference on the interwebs to the story of the US-German migrant worker with the scars, but it was on a US TV show some time back. Not coming up on the web at all with any likely keywords I can think of, which is a bit odd.

[Misha]

[Misha]

[SydneyPSIder]

[SydneyPSIder]

[Misha]

Hi SydneyPSIder.

That's the one. The gentleman from Manitoba. I'll still look it up when I get the chance. I know a gentleman whose specialty is examining people who have been injured from UFOs. He is very much aware of the Manitoba incident. In fact, this same gentleman was involved in examining the victims in the 1980 Cash/Lundrum Incident. Yes, it appears that this was our craft. Again, appears....

As for the propulsion of "their" craft. One ET specie uses solar energy and interstellar gas with 100% efficiency and no waste. You can google the Mercury SOHO footage of a craft [?] illuminated by a solar flare. And, there is another footage of a large celestial like body taking on energy from the sun.

Very important. I cannot vouch for the footage whatsoever. I do not know if this is fabricated. However, I do KNOW that a source has explained this is how its done.

[SydneyPSIder]

A source, eh? Not the cancer man....????

I don't know how their propulsion works. The fact that people feel very woozy and giddy and have hair loss etc but recover and there's no real evidence of radiation might nonetheless imply that these beasties have somehow harnessed physics in a way that uses magnetism or 'anti-gravity' or some artifact of the space-time continuum itself to propel themselves -- or still some other method of propulsion -- and it's some sort of perturbation that our bodies are not well adapted to.

We've only just discovered/guessed/theorised that some 96% of the universe appears to be made up of dark matter and dark energy, and have no idea what it even is. This is the only way to explain effects of galactic speed and so on that can't be explained by an analysis of the force of conventional gravity. And we don't really know what 'space' as a continuum is either in the end -- is it really 'empty' or a kind of 3 dimensional 'material'?

Interstellar gas is extremely sparse in the universe, and it could only be stuff like hydrogen and helium. The sun is just a huge nuclear fusion reactor fusing hydrogen into helium and traces of heavier elements -- and dying or exploding stars simply throw out tons of heavier and heavier elements that make up planets like the earth -- I can't see how UFOs and ETs can harness either 'interstellar gas' or suck something out of a star. Even 100% solar energy on the face of the earth would be unlikely to supply enough energy to propel a UFO through the atmosphere in the ways described -- at great speed, changing direction, defying gravity, etc. There appears to be no collector apparatus on them either, they are tightly self-contained, unlike man's fragile space probes bristling with extensions and antenna made out of tin foil and struts.

So what has your 'source' explained???????

And all this is assuming there is some extraterrestrial intelligence visiting the earth and that at least SOME of the accounts and/or footage is a reality.

[Misha]

[SydneyPSIder]

The 'Cancer man' was the guy in The X-Files inside the govt who knew about the ETs and was hoping they would cure his cancer from smoking...

[Twain Shakespeare]

My own suspiscion is they find us hilarious, and the stereotypical ufo encounter shows up on the Galactic equivalent of the nature channel or youtube. This theory can also accunt for the sale of Nicklebach!

[Misha]