Video of mysterious blue spiral lights over Norway

[Scepcop]

[tiger]

A simple explanation is that it is an out of control rocket. Is there any evidence that it is anything else?

[Nostradamus]

The lights coincide with the failure of a Russian rocket. What is so interesting about this is that the event was recorded by a number of different people.

Thanks for posting this scepcop. I had heard about the event, but had not seen it.

[Scepcop]

A simple explanation is that it is an out of control rocket. Is there any evidence that it is anything else?

Doesn't look like a rocket to me. Anyone can give an explanation. But critical thinkers do not believe every explanation given to them. Where is the evidence that this is a rocket? Or are you, tiger, overly eager to accept any nonparanormal explanation that you have no standards?

Remember Roswell was dismissed a balloon too, which later turned out to be a cover and not the truth. The government admitted it too and changed their story several times.

[tiger]

Is there any evidence of it being anything else? Your post suggests the answer is no.

Yes I do look for evidence and I will not except anything unless there is evidence. Evidence that it is a rocket

1. Russians say they lost a rocket at that location at that time.
2. It looks like what a rocket should look like that is going round in circles at high altitude.
3. There is no credible evidence of it being anything else.

[Nostradamus]

The failed launch matches up in time and location with the sighting.

What is so interesting here is that there were so many good witnesses to this failed launch. Why doesn't that happen with UFO sightings?

[dazsmith]

what do you think about this?
http://www.farsight.org/demo/Multiple_U ... r2009.html

as part of a predictive public remote viewing project.
I did a remote viewing session on 30th November the target chosen weeks later was this spiral event.

did i (and others) describe the event
in detail days before it actually happened?

Daz

[ProfWag]

what do you think about this?
http://www.farsight.org/demo/Multiple_U ... r2009.html

as part of a predictive public remote viewing project.
I did a remote viewing session on 30th November the target chosen weeks later was this spiral event.

did i (and others) describe the event
in detail days before it actually happened?

Daz

We can't begin to answer that question without knowing if this was actually done prior to the event. Do you have any projections pending that we could follow along with now?

[Nostradamus]

Um ... No.

I am looking though the Debra_HRVG.pdf document. I can't find much of a link. I could really stretch things and shoe horn them. I already have another event in mind for December 2009 that is a much better fit.

I am looking at the Maria_HRVG.pdf and it matches something else much better. It's the same as what I decided was a good match for Debra.

[dazsmith]

profwag:

We can't begin to answer that question without knowing if this was actually done prior to the event. Do you have any projections pending that we could follow along with now?

LOL read the website.

Multiple Universes RV Project Session Download Page

Overview:These sessions were done in November 2009, and they describe the Norwegian spiral anomaly that occurred on 9 December 2009. Please click on the yellow banner below to see the full target specification, which includes links to a video and an article regarding the event. This uses remote viewing to predict a future event.

The rv sessions were ALL done before December and posted online in public. But zipped so they couldnt be opened until a key was given.
We were attempting to describe a news event someone would pick weeks later randomly.
the target was then chosen as per the page.

Nostradamus said:

Um ... No.
I am looking though the Debra_HRVG.pdf document. I can't find much of a link. I could really stretch things and shoe horn them. I already have another event in mind for December 2009 that is a much better fit.
I am looking at the Maria_HRVG.pdf and it matches something else much better. It's the same as what I decided was a good match for Debra.

OK so you pick one out of all the sessions that may not have had such target contact and a person who cant fight their corner - brave of you - lets just stick to my session as I'm the one discussing with you.

OK yes in HINDSIGHT you could go out and match another news target to my rv data - but all this is done in public, in advance and the target chosen later. But your missing the point.

weeks in advance we rv'd a target.
an event that didn't happen until days later.
then this as a target wasn't even chosen until weeks after all this.

Now does my predictive data match the (later) chosen target or not - a simple yes or no?

daz