Look guys as i stated I'm not here to argue - but am willing to show and share stuff that you and I may not have seen that may bend each of our viewpoints. Do i think psi and the paranormal in general needs to prove its claims -
yes absolutely - most of the psi/psychic field is full of people who are deluded either with their knowledge or without.
There are many people out there who give what could be a real thing and very bad name - which is why proper remote viewing practitioners work within rules. Take Ingo Swann for example - the most lab tested psychic who has done tens of thousands of blind lab remote viewing experiments with an impeccable record and the creator of the CRV remote viewing process. 32yrs record -
http://rviewer.com/IngoSwann-ResearchOverview.htmlAll I'm saying is, that there is some documented lab tested remote viewing that has shown a statistical anomalously, and there are many examples of blind remote viewing working both in military applications and in the commercial world since the project went public in '95. IF just a single one of these is an application of psi then its the one white crow that proves all crows are not black.
This is a good document to start with:
http://www.remoteviewed.com/files/starg ... eports.pdfI do understand any scepticism but at the same time we must all be prepared to change viewpoints - i certainly have I first believed in all forms of psi - I now feel that most practitioners and probably fakes. I've turned down so many Remote viewing projects because they are'nt fully blind or the protocol isnt exactly right - yet 99% of psychics work face to face and front loaded with information.