Re: Straight Talk: The Ganzfeld (Advocates & Skeptics only)
Posted: 07 Sep 2011, 02:34
Bias is not everywhere, it is heavily on the skeptic side. There is Randi cheating with Zibarov, Wiseman cheating on the autoganzfeld
The whole Gauquelin mess and cover up that drove the open minded skeptics out of CSICOP.
The messy and badly done hatchet job on the Girl with the X-Ray eyes.
Wiseman's hatchet job on Sheldrake's dog study where he used the statements of 2 broadcasters in his calculations and made up extra rules.
Randi's outright lie about his own dog study, which never actually happened.
Marks and Cowell's sloppy staring study that Sheldrake quickly evicerated.
Hyman's sloppy and overly dramatic critique of the Afterlife Experiments.
More recently, Alcock's wild re-imagining of the history of parapsychology followed by a nonsensical critique of Daryl Bem's latest presentiment study.
You won't find anything remotely this bad on the parapsychology side of the argument.
The whole Gauquelin mess and cover up that drove the open minded skeptics out of CSICOP.
The messy and badly done hatchet job on the Girl with the X-Ray eyes.
Wiseman's hatchet job on Sheldrake's dog study where he used the statements of 2 broadcasters in his calculations and made up extra rules.
Randi's outright lie about his own dog study, which never actually happened.
Marks and Cowell's sloppy staring study that Sheldrake quickly evicerated.
Hyman's sloppy and overly dramatic critique of the Afterlife Experiments.
More recently, Alcock's wild re-imagining of the history of parapsychology followed by a nonsensical critique of Daryl Bem's latest presentiment study.
You won't find anything remotely this bad on the parapsychology side of the argument.