SCEPCOP Forum

But it works better if you think of a Question.

All the skeptics kept rattling on that nobody should even try me out!

Some "open minded" forum! Same old skeptic chicken shits.

Is this forum just overrun by the same 5 jokers in every forum, or are there people interested in checking out paranormal here too?

I am, I just need to have a better understanding of what is necessary.

What NinjaPuppy said.

Plus, you need to keep it in one topic and thread. This multiple thread posting about the same topic is NOT something I care to deal with here.

Please keep this "telepathy/mind reading" thing confined to THIS THREAD ONLY or I will start deleting the duplicates and eventually have to go around the proverbial mulberry bush with you with warnings and then I think you know what happens next.... right?

huh?

I can do better than that, let's make it ZERO threads.

G. ADAM wrote:huh?

I can do better than that, let's make it ZERO threads.

Who the heck peed in your Cheerios this morning?

You came to this forum looking for help with this in "General Discussion" YOUR title, "Psychic Seeks Skeptic"

G. ADAM >>Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:54 am

I have a 683KB text file of formatted paranormal data.

1200 experiments with names and addresses of over 1000 participants.

Who wants to review it?

Why do you think you're worthy / capable?

I have a degree in computer science and 2nd years stats up my sleeve.

I haven't met a skeptic yet who knows how to calculate the odds broken in an experiment by using a binomial table.

Cheers! Don't expect me to last long here

You received responses and Arouet attempted to open up a dialog with you. You went from asking for a review of data in that thread to an outraged set of emails from JREF, which btw contained the f'word. It seemed pertinent to your case, it wasn't directed at anyone here and it wasn't reported by any members, so I let it slide.

Derida came along and does what he always does and you object. I gave you the option to put NDA instead of NSA. Now you have a topic that asks skeptics to review your data but you don't want them participating in the topic. Fine. Whatever.

That topic dies out.

by G. ADAM » Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:00 am in "General Discussion" - "There needs to be a prize run by non-skeptics"

There are dozens of skeptics organisations offering prize money and none of them are legitimate.

I'll put up the first $500 if SCEPCOP manages the fund!

All you need is $1000 or $2000 prize, then if someone passes a test with 1,000,000:1 ODDS broken and the umpires panel all agree then awarding $2000 is NEWSWORTHY!

Without the prize, nothing will eventuate. Nobody will even put effort into testing or debunking.

I'll apply for the prize myself, think of it as my $500 bet!

I can demo mindreading in a forum, similar to a Zenner Card test.

You explain the details and people ask for some clarification. I was one of them. I couldn't quite comprehend exactly what was required. In a matter of hours, here's your response:

What? This is ridiculous, just the usual dumb ass skeptics in disguise.

Now you've escallated to pseudo name calling but with me being from the deep south of the USA, "dumb ass" can be a noun, a verb and an adjective. No one else here uses the "report this post" button, so I let it slide....again.

Then you decide to create a new thread and change topic genre over to "Pseudo Skeptic Fallacies" - "SKEPTIC OR PSEUDO SKEPTIC?"
You post something about the Australian Skeptics with TOTALLY confusing multi-colored posts and once again, members express an interest in participating in what seems to be an easier version of telepathy stated in your OP.

BTW, when these responses were posted you were on-line but obviously signed off. I also think this is where Arouet decided to take a power nap and when he returns he and I try to figure out how to keep the skeptic honest. We await your return to find out that you OP had nothing to do with you picking two numbers as once again, it was confusing.

Your reply:

you like guessing numbers you are thinking of? but not guessing questions you are thinking of?

put some MEANING into your mind, THEN I'll read it!

You abandon that thread.

Now here we are, sitting over at "Psychic Phenomena / ESP / Telepathy" - New Topic: "I can do telepathy EASY! - NSA"
You start off with:

But it works better if you think of a Question.

All the skeptics kept rattling on that nobody should even try me out!

Some "open minded" forum! Same old skeptic chicken shits.

Is this forum just overrun by the same 5 jokers in every forum, or are there people interested in checking out paranormal here too?

I don't need to copy and paste anything else as you can just go to the top to read the comments for yourself.

Since you have decided to put NSA in this topic:

SKEPTICS - Please note the NSA in the topic header. I'm sure that this was just an oversight and not a concentrated effort to once again do that voodoo, that you do, so well. That goes for you too Derida. You say you're not a skeptic and that you are by nature a "cynic" so that mean you too unless the OP says otherwise.

All (2) posts by one skeptic and our resident cynic have been deleted. The deleted post material does not impact this new thread at all.

I thought this was supposed to be psychic-positive forum?

It's not! I made 4 threads.

1/ does anybody do analysis of data? I have 1200 Questions and Blind answers. NOPE
2/ Can we start out own prize run by non-skeptics? NOPE
3/ The Australian Skeptics discard the simplest of paranormal test protocols.
4/ a test-me thread in the proper section.

You all joke about my claims, call me abusive, mental, untestable, and turn every thread into a joke about TV scrying.

I try the NSA because it's too much of a joke for you all, and the MOD threatens to ban me!

If you want to all play at a power struggle and teach the pecking order to newbies, then fine, go for it!

But I'm the only person in the world who can prove paranormal, and I can do it with ANY audience who are simply police and cooperative.

I get this treatment for 10 years, why bother going through EVEN MORE SKEPTICAL BULLSHIT!

This forum is WORSE than alt.atheism or sci.skeptic.

It's good to know my views of the fake-skeptics is not just me, but apart from that..

I try the NSA because it's too much of a joke for you all, and the MOD threatens to ban me!

For the record, this mod pointed out various offenses made by you. There are very few rules here:

1. No foul language
2. No name calling
3. No spamming or multiple threads on the same topic

The rest of life here is basic netiquette and proper manners.

I didn't do any of those! You can comprehend basic English. Read above!

You allow everyone to abuse me and tell me to frick off when at last defence I try a NSA thread.

You can read about it in the paper instead of taking part in history.

You're one of the rudest of them all laughing up at all my threads OF DIFFERENT TOPICS.

Go to hell all of you.,

I've posted in 50 forums mate, never been so fcking mistreated in all my life.

Talk about the BAIT AND SWITCH forum!


Don't worry, no more psychics will ever come here, you guys can all keep on mocking the psychics and telling them to BE SMART AND NEVER TALK BACK all you want!

Nobody is going to take away your ridicule fodder.

What a fricking con this forum is!

I've said it before and I'll say it again.



There is NO SINGLE PARANORMAL INVESTIGATOR ON EARTH!

A couple documented professors who won't even email you back.

Neither the pro or con psychic establishments care about anything or anyone apart from their own publicity.

just show us your supposed powers
stop avoiding the question
creating numerous threads and inventing weird procedures..

You outright liar! Blame ME for YOUR evasion!

The procedure is DEAD SIMPLE, we've done it numerous times in other forums.

There are a couple little added parts to make it objective - ie. I have to guess what question you are thinking of.

So this NSA scheme is all bullshit! The MODS start abusing you, the skeptics call themselves 'just critics' and all the skeptics join in abusing you anyway.

You all evaded my points and questions.

If you think guessing a number is all you need to test paranormal I may as well show my powers to a kindergarten class.

OK, HERE ARE SOME FUNDAMENTALS FOR YOU ALL.

I give answers to questions BLIND, but subjective.

That means to get an OBJECTIVE result you will need
CONTROLS
PLACEBOS
BLIND JUDGES
ENCRYPTION
PARTICIPATION
MODULAR TESTING


I won't start suggesting an easier protocol until we've done a SUBJECTIVE TEST RUN.

If you can't INVOKE THE CHANNEL how can you MEASURE IT?

Same old skeptic bullshit using TOP DOWN ARGUMENTS - "it won't work anyway" so why participate at all!