G. ADAM wrote:huh?
I can do better than that, let's make it ZERO threads.
Who the heck peed in your Cheerios this morning?
You came to this forum looking for help with this in "General Discussion" YOUR title, "Psychic Seeks Skeptic"
G. ADAM >>Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:54 am
I have a 683KB text file of formatted paranormal data.
1200 experiments with names and addresses of over 1000 participants.
Who wants to review it?
Why do you think you're worthy / capable?
I have a degree in computer science and 2nd years stats up my sleeve.
I haven't met a skeptic yet who knows how to calculate the odds broken in an experiment by using a binomial table.
Cheers! Don't expect me to last long here
You received responses and Arouet attempted to open up a dialog with you. You went from asking for a review of data in that thread to an outraged set of emails from JREF, which btw contained the f'word. It seemed pertinent to your case, it wasn't directed at anyone here and it wasn't reported by any members, so I let it slide.
Derida came along and does what he always does and you object. I gave you the option to put NDA instead of NSA. Now you have a topic that asks skeptics to review your data but you don't want them participating in the topic. Fine. Whatever.
That topic dies out.
by G. ADAM ยป Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:00 am in "General Discussion" - "There needs to be a prize run by non-skeptics"
There are dozens of skeptics organisations offering prize money and none of them are legitimate.
I'll put up the first $500 if SCEPCOP manages the fund!
All you need is $1000 or $2000 prize, then if someone passes a test with 1,000,000:1 ODDS broken and the umpires panel all agree then awarding $2000 is NEWSWORTHY!
Without the prize, nothing will eventuate. Nobody will even put effort into testing or debunking.
I'll apply for the prize myself, think of it as my $500 bet!
I can demo mindreading in a forum, similar to a Zenner Card test.
You explain the details and people ask for some clarification. I was one of them. I couldn't quite comprehend exactly what was required. In a matter of hours, here's your response:
What? This is ridiculous, just the usual dumb ass skeptics in disguise.
Now you've escallated to pseudo name calling but with me being from the deep south of the USA, "dumb ass" can be a noun, a verb and an adjective. No one else here uses the "report this post" button, so I let it slide....again.
Then you decide to create a new thread and change topic genre over to "Pseudo Skeptic Fallacies" - "SKEPTIC OR PSEUDO SKEPTIC?"
You post something about the Australian Skeptics with TOTALLY confusing multi-colored posts and once again, members express an interest in participating in what seems to be an easier version of telepathy stated in your OP.
BTW, when these responses were posted you were on-line but obviously signed off. I also think this is where Arouet decided to take a power nap and when he returns he and I try to figure out how to keep the skeptic honest. We await your return to find out that you OP had nothing to do with you picking two numbers as once again, it was confusing.
Your reply:
you like guessing numbers you are thinking of? but not guessing questions you are thinking of?
put some MEANING into your mind, THEN I'll read it!
You abandon that thread.
Now here we are, sitting over at "Psychic Phenomena / ESP / Telepathy" - New Topic: "I can do telepathy EASY! - NSA"
You start off with:
But it works better if you think of a Question.
All the skeptics kept rattling on that nobody should even try me out!
Some "open minded" forum! Same old skeptic chicken shits.
Is this forum just overrun by the same 5 jokers in every forum, or are there people interested in checking out paranormal here too?
I don't need to copy and paste anything else as you can just go to the top to read the comments for yourself.