Discussions about Psychics and Psychic Phenomena, Extra Sensory Perception, Telepathy, Psi, Clairvoyancy, 6th Sense, Psychokinesis, etc.
14 Jan 2011, 13:52
Dude, you totally misread that security forum, every post says you cannot reverse the MD5 hash.
30 digits will prevent a brute force / database approach.
I'm trying to work out my own protocol aswell, so a few more goes with MD5 won't hurt.
If you want to try another trial and go for 20:1 ODDS TOTAL BROKEN then select FOUR NEW WORDS and list them.
We can try your rules on Demo Trials 6 to 10.
Little bit of cooperation will go a long way.
15 Jan 2011, 02:33
Instead of all these encryptions and acronyms that I don't understand, couldn't I just e-mail a number between 1 and 5 to a few people and then you tell us what number it was?
15 Jan 2011, 06:51
Scientific Method is pretty open, but refusing to replicate a positive result is ludicrous!
Our newest member replica
None of you believe in signs either?
15 Jan 2011, 07:18
Nope! Only basic words and phrases can be reverse MD5'd as pointed out 4 times now.
If you want to switch to WINZIP encryptions fair enough, but changing the protocol after a true positive is cheating.
15 Jan 2011, 08:43
For the last time, if you refuse to replicate a successful result then your scientific method is nothing I want to partake in.
This happens every time I pass a trial, skeptics lift the bar before a significant result is established.
If you don't want to continue with the demonstration and nobody else will then I'm out!
Thanks for being a 1 question sucker!
15 Jan 2011, 08:47
Your "objections from the beginning about encryption" were actually "you didn't now anything about it".
MD5 is the most used encryption system world wide.
15 Jan 2011, 09:08
No. I've explained 5 times already that posting the encryption locks in the word to guess.
If you send me a naked page and line number it's liable to read ANY of your recent thoughts.
All those reverse MD5 sites are just databases of a few million text strings.
You would need over 1000000000000000000000000000000 records database file to crack our MD5s.
I agree 5:1 ODDS is nothing, but you backed on trying for 25:1 ODDS with another trial.
If you bail on the first sign of success you're truly a pseudo-skeptic.
15 Jan 2011, 10:37
If you can't use any encryption system at all it's really quite pathetic.
You can lookup
www.automeasure.com/chance.htmland work out how many trials, pass rate will be set at 50%. Or search binomial calculator.
Try out your MD5 HASH on a few of the 'MD5 crackers!'.
None of them will get it.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.