View Active Topics          Latest 100 Topics          View Your Posts          Switch to Mobile

highflyertoo Vs Skeptic Establishments January 2010

Discussions about the James Randi Educational Foundation and its Million Dollar Challenge.

Re: highflyertoo Vs Skeptic Establishments January 2010

Postby Mistislav D'ralle » 30 Oct 2009, 10:25

Here is Highflyertoo's reasons for not actually having any telekinetic powers from the last time.........
http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.p ... &start=240

There are some things that are hard to explain. I have been playing a double game of survival since I was young. I lie for the''great purpose of the greater cause''. If I don't lie against the LIE, then I will capitulate to the otherside. The otherside is the Demon World. I have been deliberately losing for many years in order to use up vital time against the FOURTH BEAST KINGDOM. The ''MEMBERS'' of the Fourth Beast Kingdom require me to submit, but I don't have to obey their threats of malicious intent.

I am the key to the beginning of the end.


Followed up by his next posting.....

I will perform Telekinesis in the near future, yet some other events of my future dreams are still to take place ''if'' I am to make a proper job of annihilating the devil's plans for the Earth. Had I done ''certain things'' before the month of May, then I would have run out of steam in my fight against the devil. I would have only acheived a temporary victory over the devil , and then I would have turned and then come as a whirlwind against the whole world, including leading the assault of Armageddon.

I was foretold/chosen to be the Devil's Strength, Yet Almighty God has given me extra time to repent and resist the Devil's Will. What I require to do is to set up attention towards me so then people can see that the ''supernatural'' actually exists
Mistislav D'ralle
 
Posts: 38
Joined: 17 Aug 2009, 10:46






Re: highflyertoo Vs Skeptic Establishments January 2010

Postby brett » 30 Oct 2009, 13:09

Mistislav D'ralle wrote:Here is Highflyertoo's reasons for not actually having any telekinetic powers from the last time.........
http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.p ... &start=240

There are some things that are hard to explain. I have been playing a double game of survival since I was young. I lie for the''great purpose of the greater cause''. If I don't lie against the LIE, then I will capitulate to the otherside. The otherside is the Demon World. I have been deliberately losing for many years in order to use up vital time against the FOURTH BEAST KINGDOM. The ''MEMBERS'' of the Fourth Beast Kingdom require me to submit, but I don't have to obey their threats of malicious intent.

I am the key to the beginning of the end.


Followed up by his next posting.....

I will perform Telekinesis in the near future, yet some other events of my future dreams are still to take place ''if'' I am to make a proper job of annihilating the devil's plans for the Earth. Had I done ''certain things'' before the month of May, then I would have run out of steam in my fight against the devil. I would have only acheived a temporary victory over the devil , and then I would have turned and then come as a whirlwind against the whole world, including leading the assault of Armageddon.

I was foretold/chosen to be the Devil's Strength, Yet Almighty God has given me extra time to repent and resist the Devil's Will. What I require to do is to set up attention towards me so then people can see that the ''supernatural'' actually exists



righttttttt ................................ :?
LIFE - just filling the bits between birth, death and taxes
User avatar
brett
 
Posts: 436
Joined: 06 Aug 2009, 22:23
Location: Plymouth UK

Re: highflyertoo Vs Skeptic Establishments January 2010

Postby highflyertoo » 30 Oct 2009, 20:14

so you are confused brett, that's expected. Remember this at least ... The paranormal is not what you think.
Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
highflyertoo
 
Posts: 400
Joined: 26 Jul 2009, 09:57

Re: highflyertoo Vs Skeptic Establishments January 2010

Postby brett » 30 Oct 2009, 22:30

highflyertoo wrote:so you are confused brett, that's expected. Remember this at least ... The paranormal is not what you think.



uh huh , so would you like to discourse on exactly WHAT the paranormal IS then HF2 ?? - I'm sure ALL of us , believers and skeptics alike would be fascinated in your take on it all :? :?



:?
LIFE - just filling the bits between birth, death and taxes
User avatar
brett
 
Posts: 436
Joined: 06 Aug 2009, 22:23
Location: Plymouth UK

Re: highflyertoo Vs Skeptic Establishments January 2010

Postby ProfWag » 30 Oct 2009, 23:21

brett wrote:
highflyertoo wrote:so you are confused brett, that's expected. Remember this at least ... The paranormal is not what you think.



uh huh , so would you like to discourse on exactly WHAT the paranormal IS then HF2 ?? - I'm sure ALL of us , believers and skeptics alike would be fascinated in your take on it all :? :?



:?

Truthfully, I would be fascinated to hear it from just about anyone but him. Sorry for offending.
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: highflyertoo Vs Skeptic Establishments January 2010

Postby brett » 31 Oct 2009, 05:50

Truthfully, I would be fascinated to hear it from just about anyone but him. Sorry for offending


oh contraire prof - lets hear what the guy"s take is on the REAL paranormal - i need to be de-confused ( just humor me eh ?? ) ;)
LIFE - just filling the bits between birth, death and taxes
User avatar
brett
 
Posts: 436
Joined: 06 Aug 2009, 22:23
Location: Plymouth UK

Re: highflyertoo Vs Skeptic Establishments January 2010

Postby highflyertoo » 31 Oct 2009, 08:39

The paranormal is pertaining to spirits and the influence of those spirits.

Heaven and Hell are not fables.

Superstitions arose from people misunderstanding the interpretations of paranormal events. It's hard to ''see'' the paranormal, yet even more difficult to record the paranormal to be viewed at will.

The paranormal are much smarter than mere humans,and humans are much smarter than me.
Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
highflyertoo
 
Posts: 400
Joined: 26 Jul 2009, 09:57

Re: highflyertoo Vs Skeptic Establishments January 2010

Postby brett » 31 Oct 2009, 14:34

The paranormal is pertaining to spirits and the influence of those spirits.


er this i know

Heaven and Hell are not fables.


this is debatable - as religion is a construct of man - no proof of any "god figure " has been satisfactorily provided - and the concept of heaven and hell are a carrot and stick to beat religious believers with

Superstitions arose from people misunderstanding the interpretations of paranormal events.


quite possibly - or misunderstanding natural phenomena before science figured it out ??

It's hard to ''see'' the paranormal, yet even more difficult to record the paranormal to be viewed at will.


this I also already know

The paranormal are much smarter than mere humans,and humans are much smarter than me.


well NO argument there buddy ;)

so this is your great revelation then HF2 ?? what a crock !! - i thought you where at least going to give us a reasonable dissertation on the real paranormal and your supposed place in the scheme of things - and all we get is a few vague statements - get outta here - you are insulting our intelligence :roll: :roll:
LIFE - just filling the bits between birth, death and taxes
User avatar
brett
 
Posts: 436
Joined: 06 Aug 2009, 22:23
Location: Plymouth UK

Re: highflyertoo Vs Skeptic Establishments January 2010

Postby brett » 31 Oct 2009, 14:35

brett wrote:
Truthfully, I would be fascinated to hear it from just about anyone but him. Sorry for offending


oh contraire prof - lets hear what the guy"s take is on the REAL paranormal - i need to be de-confused ( just humor me eh ?? ) ;)



QED methinks :lol:
LIFE - just filling the bits between birth, death and taxes
User avatar
brett
 
Posts: 436
Joined: 06 Aug 2009, 22:23
Location: Plymouth UK

Re: highflyertoo Vs Skeptic Establishments January 2010

Postby highflyertoo » 31 Oct 2009, 15:31

So brett, what are the paranormal things you claim to have experienced. Got any to tell? unless your intelligence is falsely stated. We are talking paranormal intelligence, eh ?
So now you actually don't know about the paranormal as you previously claimed, Otherwise you would be responding differently.
Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
highflyertoo
 
Posts: 400
Joined: 26 Jul 2009, 09:57

Re: highflyertoo Vs Skeptic Establishments January 2010

Postby highflyertoo » 31 Oct 2009, 15:36

So brett , you know demons exist? You know Heaven and Hell exist?

Your problem brett is claiming not to know. Tell what you know about the ''actual paranormal''. Please stop trying to act intelligent in response to the Paranormal as you know NOTHING yet speak ALOT.........
Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
highflyertoo
 
Posts: 400
Joined: 26 Jul 2009, 09:57

Re: highflyertoo Vs Skeptic Establishments January 2010

Postby ProfWag » 31 Oct 2009, 17:53

brett wrote:
Truthfully, I would be fascinated to hear it from just about anyone but him. Sorry for offending


oh contraire prof - lets hear what the guy"s take is on the REAL paranormal - i need to be de-confused ( just humor me eh ?? ) ;)

Don't say I didn't warn you Brett... ;-)
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: highflyertoo Vs Skeptic Establishments January 2010

Postby brett » 31 Oct 2009, 18:25

yes prof you did and i was not disappointed , exactly what i expected this guy knows less about the paranormal than my new cat does :roll:

HF2 - AH SO NOW WE START WITH THE INSULTS ( PREDICTABLE ) - heaven and hell ?? did you actually READ my last post ??

what have i experienced ? - duh oh - have you read my posts in the paranormal experiences section ??

and i probably know a LOT more about the paranormal than you do buddy , as it is obvious that you are mixing up religious dogma with the paranormal and how DO you expect me to respond ?? you make claims to know soo much and that you have "inside knowledge" from some almighty , yet when challenged you come out with bland generalisms - telling me and the rest of us here nothing new - so go figure - if you want to impress us on this forum - start backing up some of the stuff you claim ,especially the stuff you claim to be able to do

demons ?? - awww heck not that old bogeyman again - NO SUCH THING another monster to frighten children of religious dogmatists with :roll:

answer me this then HF2 if you know so much about demons - which classification of said demons do you work to ??

i dunno what you are smoking man - but it must be some good s***
LIFE - just filling the bits between birth, death and taxes
User avatar
brett
 
Posts: 436
Joined: 06 Aug 2009, 22:23
Location: Plymouth UK

Re: highflyertoo Vs Skeptic Establishments January 2010

Postby NinjaPuppy » 31 Oct 2009, 18:39

Image
Is this your cat Brett?
User avatar
NinjaPuppy
 
Posts: 4002
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 20:44

Re: highflyertoo Vs Skeptic Establishments January 2010

Postby brett » 01 Nov 2009, 00:30

NinjaPuppy wrote:Image
Is this your cat Brett?


:lol: :lol: :lol: shes too busy hunting ( we have a slight mousings problem at Che Brett ) to go a HAUNTING ;)
LIFE - just filling the bits between birth, death and taxes
User avatar
brett
 
Posts: 436
Joined: 06 Aug 2009, 22:23
Location: Plymouth UK

PreviousNext

Return to JREF / Randi Challenge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest