Discussions about the James Randi Educational Foundation and its Million Dollar Challenge.
09 Sep 2009, 07:23
How reliable do you think lie detector tests are? Why do you think a lie detector result isn't allowed for a conviction? My god the ignorance of conspiracy theorists is overwhelming. Do you know how many people fail lie detector tests when they answered truthfully? Know how many people have passd lie detector tests when lying? It only measures physical changes while you answer it is not psychic and doesn't read your mind-heh kinda like sylvia brown and othr charlatans. Not to mention the graph result reading is only as good as the person administering the test. I personally would never take one with the exception of employment (i.e. any local law enforcement job, federal law enforcement job that requires it) otherwise i would not take one and don't blame anyone else for not believing in a machine that has been proven to not be accurate and has human error of the interpretor.
09 Sep 2009, 09:29
LIARS are always afraid of Polygraph tests. Innocent people almost always ask to take a lie detector test to clear their name.
randi won't do it ... guess why ... he's guilty !
09 Sep 2009, 11:11
[Post deleted]
10 Sep 2009, 15:19
Umm okay. Lie detectors are already used for most law enforcement applicants also. Your point is what again? Like i said in a previous post I personally would take a polygraph for a law enforcement type job , but would not take one to prove a challenge or to prove anything else. Sill doesn't make them accurate. Look at Customs border patrol forums these days how agents are bitching that new recruits have to take a polygraph cause it also removes good applicants who are not lying.
10 Sep 2009, 15:39
Polygraphs are not only a farce, they are a dangerous farce.
I do know that polygraph tests are mandatory for certain types of employmet and that some firms insist that their workers submit periodically to polygraph testing, although I regard this as a total travesty myself.
Polygraphs have been demonstrated time and again to be incapable of distinguishing between the truth and a lie, therefore, I think it most unjust that a persons continued ability to earn an honest living should be at the mercy of some so-called "technician" and his box of tricks.
10 Sep 2009, 19:47
Highondrugs,
Exactly work place agreement which is the only way I would take one because they are not very accurate and only as good as the polygraph examiner. People are human and err. Its absurd to expect Randy to take one about the MDC.
11 Sep 2009, 03:57
I doubt very much that James Randi knows, and he certainly wouldn't care, that some nutcase on a tiny backwater internet forum thinks he should take a lie detector test. This topic is absurd.
Frank Lee
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.