NinjaPuppy wrote:Ahhhh yes. How could I forget!
I forgot to shower this morning
NinjPuppy wrote:I must agree with you that Arouet does express an extremely high level of tact when debating, compared to many here who have come and gone.
Let's not stroke his ego too much!
NinjaPuppy wrote:Big guns? Meh.
Yes it was meant as sarcasm, I honestly don't think there is a proponent of the establishments status quo with a level of intelligence on par with me on the JREF board. (Or anywhere else as I have not been corrected yet regarding that unique facet of canadian law. I look forward to being corrected anywhere anytime. I was really hoping a lawyer wouldn't end up agreeing with me but alas no such luck yet.)
NinjaPuppy wrote:From the small sample of what I've read over there it's more like defeat via mob mentality. They "pile on", making it hard to sometimes follow a coherent train of thought. At least for me.
Not just you. It would be hard for anyone with a sincere intent to sludge through that muddy filth pit of mere opinions.
NinjaPuppy wrote:Well, I'm sure that Arouet will be pleased to hear this.
Yes i'm hoping using his name as a reference is the sway needed to open the door to the snake pit.
NinjaPuppy wrote:Nope. I never meant to imply that the JREF forum was biased. Just that their posting rules allow for things that may or may not be allowed or should I say, appreciated here.
Well what rules disallow facts? They have a conspiracy section and even a 9/11 section. They even have a non-usa politics section.
Something right up my alley. What reason could they have to continue denying registration to me?
No one from JREF has been able to prove me wrong and I have Arouet Agreeing with me on the "policy" as well as accepting that slavery as good and moral.( For the record i'm going to go out on a limb and state that slavery is immoral anytime.)
Can I expect JREF to lecture me on how slavery can be good like Arouet has?