View Active Topics          Latest 100 Topics          View Your Posts          Switch to Mobile

JREF Blackmail Tapes

Discussions about the James Randi Educational Foundation and its Million Dollar Challenge.

Re: JREF Blackmail Tapes

Postby The Professor » 28 Sep 2009, 06:35

POLANSKI is arrested on Sex charge from 1977 ... Like I've been saying .. The new laws make diddling under aged children still illegal with no statute of limitations !!!!
Look out randi ...
I've been saying this all along !!!!!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090927/ap_ ... d_polanski

http://www.examiner.com/x-1168-Crime-Ex ... iner-email
THE MAN THE SKEPTICS REFUSED TO TEST FOR A MILLION DOLLARS
The Professor
 
Posts: 343
Joined: 20 Jul 2009, 11:26






Re: JREF Blackmail Tapes

Postby Azrael » 30 Sep 2009, 08:06

The Professor wrote:POLANSKI is arrested on Sex charge from 1977 ... Like I've been saying .. The new laws make diddling under aged children still illegal with no statute of limitations !!!!
Look out randi ...
I've been saying this all along !!!!!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090927/ap_ ... d_polanski

http://www.examiner.com/x-1168-Crime-Ex ... iner-email


You were also saying all along that your Son's lame band Broadway Calls would have a UK top 20 hit in September. A paranormal prediction no less. Seems the EVP's have gone quiet on that front.

Stick to promotoing your rubbish equivoqe phone trick on Magic Cafe. :lol:
I'm always very skeptical of any situation where someone's notability hinges on their connection to another notable person
Azrael
 
Posts: 232
Joined: 23 Jul 2009, 02:32

Re: JREF Blackmail Tapes

Postby Craig Browning » 13 Feb 2010, 06:22

I've not waded through all of this but I do have transcripts tied to one particular set of tapes in which Randi is playing Uncle Pervy. Too, as I understand things, Randi has been "investigated" on a couple of other incidents in which young lads were involved, including some illegal immigrant types (ironically, I think they were Haitian). There are likewise former employees of Tannens Magic from the 1970s and early 80s who claim (privately) that Randi has made advances on them when they were well under age. For me, far too many coincidences pointing in the same direction, tied to the same common factors.

Michael Jackson was stigmatized on less, so how is St. James getting off the hook?

This is one aspect to the Randi issue that I've wanted to gain more supporting details on because it is one of the black marks on his resume that seems to be best buried... I just can't find someone capable of following the money trail... the number of kids that the old guy put through college who are likewise tied to these "rumors" :?
User avatar
Craig Browning
 
Posts: 1526
Joined: 13 Feb 2010, 05:20
Location: Northampton, MA

Re: JREF Blackmail Tapes

Postby The Professor » 01 Mar 2010, 13:12

Are you saying that Randi has been financing the education of young boys? That's OK isn't it?
But why?
Have you asked Ford Kross about it?
THE MAN THE SKEPTICS REFUSED TO TEST FOR A MILLION DOLLARS
The Professor
 
Posts: 343
Joined: 20 Jul 2009, 11:26

Re: JREF Blackmail Tapes

Postby Craig Browning » 03 Mar 2010, 05:15

The Professor wrote:Are you saying that Randi has been financing the education of young boys? That's OK isn't it?
But why?
Have you asked Ford Kross about it?


Ford? :lol:

Truthfully, no... never thought to. But then he's had his moments over the years, hasn't he? :lol:
User avatar
Craig Browning
 
Posts: 1526
Joined: 13 Feb 2010, 05:20
Location: Northampton, MA

Re: JREF Blackmail Tapes

Postby The Professor » 03 Mar 2010, 10:29

Yes he has ... That's why I believe him!
THE MAN THE SKEPTICS REFUSED TO TEST FOR A MILLION DOLLARS
The Professor
 
Posts: 343
Joined: 20 Jul 2009, 11:26

Re: JREF Blackmail Tapes

Postby ciscop » 03 Mar 2010, 13:33

The Professor wrote:Yes he has ... That's why I believe him!


believe? you believe anything
you believe Barney is a real purple dinosaur
then again..
you drink too much

retire from Mentalism and do balloon animals like Jimbo
he learned his lesson. Now Raymond is back on the closet of failed gimmicks (we all have one of those) :lol:
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
User avatar
ciscop
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: 22 Jul 2009, 12:04

Re: JREF Blackmail Tapes

Postby The Professor » 04 Mar 2010, 11:12

Sorry, but just like your other friends Raymond is obviously out of the closet!

But back to the Blackmail tapes.
THE MAN THE SKEPTICS REFUSED TO TEST FOR A MILLION DOLLARS
The Professor
 
Posts: 343
Joined: 20 Jul 2009, 11:26

Re: JREF Blackmail Tapes

Postby ciscop » 04 Mar 2010, 11:24

no he isnt
jimbo is doing balloon routines in banquets
hardly a ghost can fit into that

hey
if he was aiming for an hilarious routine he got it
the ghost possesion was the most over acted thing ever on tv
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
User avatar
ciscop
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: 22 Jul 2009, 12:04

Re: JREF Blackmail Tapes

Postby lipservice » 05 Mar 2010, 19:33

Can anyone date the tapes?

In one of them he mentions that he nearly "came to blows" with Jule Eisenbud on TV -- this during the Ted Serios saga. This likely puts them as being made in 1967.

In any case, in my judgement the 2nd recording particularly renders a joke Randi's "explanation" for the tapes and how they came to be. The caller claims to have got Randi's number from their mutual friend Ricky. Ricky is later brought up in the conversation again and Randi says: "Have you ever done it with Ricky?" "He's been up here a few times". 9.5 inches!!! Maybe he does deserve the "Amazing" appellation after all.

Incidentally I think much of Randi's "explanation" for the tape is totally bogus. Punching a ufo enthusiast on stage to a standing ovation??? Can witnesses be produced from this very public gathering? This assertion that at the Byrd Randi trial the "sex tape" was played at Randi's insistence!

What else is delilberate deception? Can anything he says be believed? And why are the skeptics so utterly unskeptical about the things he and other CSICOPians say?
lipservice
 
Posts: 1
Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 03:13

Re: JREF Blackmail Tapes

Postby Eteponge » 06 Mar 2010, 05:20

lipservice wrote:In one of them he mentions that he nearly "came to blows" with Jule Eisenbud on TV -- this during the Ted Serios saga. This likely puts them as being made in 1967.

Off topic, but Michael Prescott wrote an excellent response to skeptical attacks on Ted Serios on his blog several years ago ...

http://michaelprescott.typepad.com/mich ... erios.html
"I think Eteponge's Blog is a pretty cool guy. eh debates Skeptics and doesnt afraid of anything."
User avatar
Eteponge
 
Posts: 300
Joined: 06 Jun 2009, 13:26

Re: JREF Blackmail Tapes

Postby The Professor » 07 Mar 2010, 11:48

lipservice wrote:Can anyone date the tapes?

In one of them he mentions that he nearly "came to blows" with Jule Eisenbud on TV -- this during the Ted Serios saga. This likely puts them as being made in 1967.

In any case, in my judgement the 2nd recording particularly renders a joke Randi's "explanation" for the tapes and how they came to be. The caller claims to have got Randi's number from their mutual friend Ricky. Ricky is later brought up in the conversation again and Randi says: "Have you ever done it with Ricky?" "He's been up here a few times". 9.5 inches!!! Maybe he does deserve the "Amazing" appellation after all.

Incidentally I think much of Randi's "explanation" for the tape is totally bogus. Punching a ufo enthusiast on stage to a standing ovation??? Can witnesses be produced from this very public gathering? This assertion that at the Byrd Randi trial the "sex tape" was played at Randi's insistence!

What else is delilberate deception? Can anything he says be believed? And why are the skeptics so utterly unskeptical about the things he and other CSICOPians say?


I applaud your open mindedness on this subject.

Keep looking ... There is so much more!

I've been told that there has been a method of burying the internet exposures deep some secret way ... But if you dig deep enough, you will find quotes from the guy JR said he punched ... It's Hilarious !!!!!

Don't be surprised if you start getting strange emails from upset JREFers .....
THE MAN THE SKEPTICS REFUSED TO TEST FOR A MILLION DOLLARS
The Professor
 
Posts: 343
Joined: 20 Jul 2009, 11:26

Re: JREF Blackmail Tapes

Postby Nostradamus » 10 Mar 2010, 01:16

Why is this still called blackmail when the contents - true or not - are in the open? I should point out that if the conversations were illegally obtained, then posting them online might also constitute a crime.
Last edited by Nostradamus on 10 Mar 2010, 13:45, edited 1 time in total.
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
User avatar
Nostradamus
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 14:08

Re: JREF Blackmail Tapes

Postby NinjaPuppy » 10 Mar 2010, 03:07

Professor - Your transcripts of these so called tapes have been removed. Please do not post them anywhere on this forum again.
User avatar
NinjaPuppy
 
Posts: 4002
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 20:44

Re: JREF Blackmail Tapes

Postby ciscop » 10 Mar 2010, 13:43

The Professor wrote:
lipservice wrote:Can anyone date the tapes?

In one of them he mentions that he nearly "came to blows" with Jule Eisenbud on TV -- this during the Ted Serios saga. This likely puts them as being made in 1967.

In any case, in my judgement the 2nd recording particularly renders a joke Randi's "explanation" for the tapes and how they came to be. The caller claims to have got Randi's number from their mutual friend Ricky. Ricky is later brought up in the conversation again and Randi says: "Have you ever done it with Ricky?" "He's been up here a few times". 9.5 inches!!! Maybe he does deserve the "Amazing" appellation after all.

Incidentally I think much of Randi's "explanation" for the tape is totally bogus. Punching a ufo enthusiast on stage to a standing ovation??? Can witnesses be produced from this very public gathering? This assertion that at the Byrd Randi trial the "sex tape" was played at Randi's insistence!

What else is delilberate deception? Can anything he says be believed? And why are the skeptics so utterly unskeptical about the things he and other CSICOPians say?


I applaud your open mindedness on this subject.

Keep looking ... There is so much more!

I've been told that there has been a method of burying the internet exposures deep some secret way ... But if you dig deep enough, you will find quotes from the guy JR said he punched ... It's Hilarious !!!!!

Don't be surprised if you start getting strange emails from upset JREFers .....


lipservice 1post?..
the name fits the crime

i guess this is a clear example of ventroloquism in the cyberspace
the professor now is talking to himself and congratulating himself.. busted!

the legend of dave´s lameness keeps growing day to day.. well done!
you keep digging your hole! :lol: go dave go!
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
User avatar
ciscop
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: 22 Jul 2009, 12:04

PreviousNext

Return to JREF / Randi Challenge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron