SCEPCOP Forum

Yeah, i am willing to take Derrida at his word that he meant no insult.

There is a good lesson to be gleaned from this though; it is exceptionally easy for your meaning & intent to be misunderstood in print. We should all be careful and proof read our posts before hitting the submit button. In my case because of my terrible spelling!

That was something. Nice post though.

How can you ignore a 1 mill $ challenge, it's impossible, hahah. Great video by the way

Check out Victor Zammit's cross examination of James Randi, from their dialogue:

http://www.victorzammit.com/articles/st ... lmay11.htm

It always amazes me that this guy was a practising lawyer.

His style is a little unusual...

heh. I just can't imagine this guy in actual practice. Maybe he had a different style back then. Thing is, for all the different styles, one thing law school really does is teach you to approach problems in a certain way - and this guy doesn't approach problems anything like any lawyer I know.

heh - true!

Randi lied to weasel out of my challenge for his publicity stunt million dollars after he had accepted my challenge. For several years I have a standing offer of ten thousand dollars that I will give to Randi or any of his zombified followers if I can not prove Randi a liar. After five years there has not been one taker of my honesty challenge. It's a real simple challenge we each bring ten grand cash or certified check and give the money to an unbiased third party, perhaps an off duty police officer, and if I can not prove Randi a liar the other person gets my ten grand, if I can I take theirs home with me. Professional pseudo skeptics here is your chance for a quick buck, don't be cowards you can use the money, I dare you!
...... Bill Perron billperron@billperron.com contact me, I'm friendly and easy to talk to.