I suggest we put up a poll for all members and interested visitors to vote for or against making HF2 a moderator. Because that's how we do things in the free world.
This is not a free world Kevin. It's the forum owners world.
Change of Mods required for free speech
68 posts
• Page 3 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Re: Change of Mods required for free speech
This is not a free world Kevin. It's the forum owners world. Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: Change of Mods required for free speech
HF2 has been permanantly banned from this forum.
Re: Change of Mods required for free speechDemocratic governance is the primary form of government for the planet Earth. I really don't see a problem with it, do you?
This forum should be about supporting paranormals and anti-skeptics, not banning them. I'm certain that HF2 will be a better moderator than current moderators. And I'm certain that this community will benefit and prosper with better moderation. Allow the vote.
Re: Change of Mods required for free speech
dude... kevin do you realize that HF2 was in a mental institution? and that´s a known fact, HF2 talked about it, he fights statues with his mental powers! still, you hate skeptics so much that you rather have a maniac than somebody that uses the tools of crithical thinking.. that so... incredibly funny.. hf2 is a nut but how do we call people that support a nut? For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Change of Mods required for free speech
From the Home Page of this Forum: Welcome to SCEPCOP - The Scientific Committee to Evaluate Pseudo-Skeptical Criticism of the Paranormal SCEPCOP is the 1st Coalition of Paranormal Researchers, Investigators, Writers and Intellectuals united to counter and expose the PseudoSkepticism movement for their fallacies, religious fanaticism, unscientific behavior, misinformation, denial, suppression, bigotry and ridicule toward all data, experience or science that challenges orthodoxy or does not fit into a materialistic reductionist paradigm. We do not support every quack claim out there, but advocate true skepticism, proper application of the Scientific Method, objectivity and unbiased open inquiry toward all paranormal and unconventional data, experience and science. We are the world's first counter-pseudoskeptic movement providing resources, articles, books, videos and an online community. We support the true application of the Scientific Method, which involves the updating of one's hypothesis to the fit the data, rather than rejecting any and all data that doesn't fit into an "a priori" hypothesis, which the PseudoSkeptics do, which is totally unscientific and the antithesis of the Scientific Method.
Re: Change of Mods required for free speech
Name a country using a democratic government. Hint: the US is a republic. Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: Change of Mods required for free speechI'm not asking for ownership of the board. Nor am I asking for current moderators to be removed or even voted up or down. I'm asking for fair and unbiased moderation and protection from irresponsible moderators.
I don't have a problem with HF2. He didn't stalk, harass, confront and insult me .. as Nostradamus always does. His opinions of gays are his opinions, and protected free speech in most parts of the world. But I didn't sense the type of malevolent homophobic behavior (ie..stalking, harassing, insulting, confronting) from HF2 that I sense from other members of this board.
Re: Change of Mods required for free speechI do confront you. That's what a discussion is all about isn't it. You are free to challenge my posts. I made all sorts of posts about things I believe in and things I do not believe in. I make posts about serious issues and humorous issues.
Please tell us which members you believe to have posted malevolent homophobic comments. Here are quotes from a member of this forum and a permanently banned member. Kevin Kane said
HF2 said
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: Change of Mods required for free speechEver hear the phrase "actions speak louder than words". I am calling Nostradamus a homophobe. As someone with 35 years of experience personally and professionally with the subject, I am qualified to make this judgement.
Ninja Puppy has also shown nothing but bias, bigotry and intolerance towards me since day 1, with her constant warnings, threats, censorship, deleting, locking, banning, passive-aggressive remarks, and worst of all .. letting skeptics moderate and lock threads. Ninja Puppy should do the honorable thing and resign.
Re: Change of Mods required for free speech
So you have no evidence and you make another unsubstantiated claim. No surprise there Kevin. What we do see from Kevin is venom and vitriol displayed. Kevin supports hatred and homophobia. I'd say your actions speak as loud as your words. Kevin you should do the honorable thing and post interesting and positive information to this forum. Stop and the whining and complaining and act your age. You claim to be at least 35 years of age. Get on with your life. Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: Change of Mods required for free speech
Sorry but that's not going to happen Kevin. You have tried to bait me into some sort of argument with you for quite some time now and that's also not going to happen.
Re: Change of Mods required for free speechI think I need to point something out here... especially given that I am an out of the proverbial broom closet "fag" (as some would say)... I've not felt one single bit of homophobia on this forum except from Kevin (don't think I interacted too much with the other)... not directed at me specifically but as a generalization. I can also assure you that gay's aren't typically "self-hating" though some can have issues because of familial persecution & rejection (especially throughout that wonderful Bible Belt region of the U.S.)
I've seen this sort of bigotry up close, in my own family on many levels. I've seen even uglier demonstrations of it in the lives of the many kids I've helped get the counseling, support and resources they needed for getting off the streets and whatever else the case might be... UNDERSTAND, they are on the streets because bigots, like yourself Kevin, breed them and then disown them because of some kind of invented morality that's founded on horse pucky... I say that because you will want to counter with the fickle statement of homosexuality not being "Natural" and "Against Nature" when in fact there are over 1,500 known species outside the primate/humane category known for same sex paring... at least three such species are common barnyard animals including cow and horse... but then maybe it's a choice for them as well and they are choosing to live in sin ![]() GROW UP and learn what the facts are and stop trying to justify your prejudices. To the rest of you, thanks! I'm enjoying this forum and don't feel the least bit threatened on any front. ![]()
Re: Change of Mods required for free speechThanks for that Craig. I have enjoyed all of your insight here. You are a very wise person.
Re: Change of Mods required for free speech
...and you're a very cute puppy avatar...
Re: Change of Mods required for free speech
Let me see if I can summarize Mr Nostradamus' thinking. According to his proposal, his reasoning; people who say certain words and phrases must be homophobes, because gays would NEVER, EVER use such words and phrases. Acting upon this logic, anyone who uses such words and phrases must be a homophobe and should be banned. Is that a fair summary? Yet: 1. It's been shown that Nostradamus has a hard time comprehending sarcasm and satire. 2. It's been shown that Nostradamus is a bald-faced liar. 3. It's been shown that Nostradamus is an abusive stalker and troll. Should we review the evidence for these facs, Nostradamus?
68 posts
• Page 3 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Return to JREF / Randi Challenge Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests |
|