Arouet wrote:Honestly, what I see from you Sydney, is a tendency to only engage on these topics by throwing out a bunch of snippets of issues (such as you did here) - but when it comes through going into each snippet in more detail, to see if they hold up, you quickly move on saying something along the lines of: Ok that one doesn't hold up, but look at all these other areas!
I'm not sure what you're saying, apart from detecting a lot of empty attempts at smear instead of actual logical argument.
Are you saying you have hard, irrefutable, independently verified evidence that Apollo astronauts could not have been harmed by the radiation they would have received if they went through the van Allen belts twice and were exposed to solar radiation for several days protected by very little, including a period of the biggest recorded solar flare of the century?
If you can't produce that evidence, you've pretty well lost the debate outright.
Or are you saying you've found errors in White's analysis? If that's the case, I've said before you should take it up directly with him -- message him on Facebook, email him or post on his youtube account. Emailing him with a single, concise summary of your rebuttal of his points would probably be most effective. He may respond, he often responds to his critics, and often publicly on youtube.
You seemed to write a lot of garbled stuff over one thread that nobody could follow, and, as you yourself have said in the past, 'I'm not going through pages of posts to find out what was said'.
In the meantime, here's another couple of fake NASA pictures, where the earth is of course way too small in the sky for a start, it would be several times bigger than the moon we see as it is so much larger but at the same distance. Apart from the obvious cut and paste effort by NASA 'artists', of course.
The angular size of the Moon viewed from the Earth is about half a degree. Since the diameter of the Earth is about four times that of the Moon, the Earth viewed from the Moon should appear to be about four times as wide as the Moon viewed from the Earth, or 2 degrees. Here, as it is, the pasted Earth appears to be about half the diameter of the Moon from Earth.http://www.aulis.com/jackstudies_b.html
The fact that Arouet is not the least bit 'sceptical' of the official story of the Apollo moon account, despite the considerable amount of evidence amassed just on the http://www.aulis.com/investigation.htm
site, amongst many other sites, suggests that he is not in this to be a 'sceptic' at all, he has another agenda — to discredit any criticism of the reality of the manned moon landings. His refusal to look at or accept any of the considerable pile of evidence, brushing it off with 'there's too many pages of info on the thread now', and continually harping on a rebuttal nobody could follow, and his false assertions that 'evasion repeatedly happens' clearly suggests that it's something beyond even pseudoscepticism, he's probably one of these casual intelligence workers for the spooks. Presumably the same applies to his colleagues here — if not, they must really(?) just be sick in the head.
Either way, it just confirms again that pseudosceptics should be ignored.