Discuss PseudoSkeptics and their Fallacies. Share strategies for debating them.
that's not my claim, that was trying to pin down what Australia Skeptics accept as a claim.
It helps to understand a claim if you READ IT!
None of you got to STEP 1!
QUESTION & ANSWER PHASE
The Tester writes down 10 yes or no questions that he has a genuine interest in finding out the answer to, not just an interest in whether I can give the answer for test purposes. The questions should cover different topics and use various formats, not all of the same type like whether something will happen in the future on all 10 questions.
48 hours later and none of you have thought of a yes/no question yet...
Oh, that's too bad. Well, I'm not interested in participating in your question and answer one. Too uncertain, for reasons people have given. Especially if we don't know the answer. It would be based on interpretations that we could argue about forever. That's not a good way of showing psi. I don't know how you don't rule out just normal interpretation yourself.
Ninja, I'm afraid your two numbers are going to go to waste. Hopefully you have other uses for them. I'm going to save mine for the next time I play the lottery - I don't do it often, but at least they'll be used.
I hate to waste.
Fine, but the test is 100% objective, directly equivalent to a Zenner Card test.
In fact, all you have to do is use Question Cards instead of stars and wavy lines and I can read your card.
But if you won't test out the subjective answers first because of your 'skeptical beliefs' that go against science and observation, then you hardly have the right aptitude to do a formal objective test.
You refuse to get the channels working at all before a formal test! Like every skeptic out there!
Unbelievable in the very essence of the term.
LIke not testing a rocket engine on the ground, NAH ITS GOTTA GO TO THE MOON OR IT DIDNT WORK
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests