SCEPCOP Forum

You guys are hilarious. Why would I need to have a position on this guys claims? I asked a question.

What's your position?

State it, then.

So, you believe it to be a hoax without any evidence, yet you still lend credence to Edamaruku even though it's conclusive that he in intending to deceive.

Of course he could have been given food or drink. Entirely possible. It's also entirely possible that the whole story itself is a hoax, there were no other doctors involved, it had nothing to do with DIPAS, and there were no ethics committees. A lot of things are possible.

Which is why I wanted to see some evidence, other than some debunker being deceptive.

The fact that he was allowed guests is not evidence, and the fact that there are brief seconds where other individuals are blocking view of Jani's head are not evidence of a hoax. So, no, you don't have any evidence that it was a hoax. Circumstances which enable a hoax to be a possibility is not evidence of a hoax.

has anyone mentioned Therese Neumann or Hira R. Manek or other yogis in this thread? (don't have the energy or time to go through every page checking.) inedia's been around for a while--the body metabolises light, uses it for internal communication, and emits light in pretty large amounts too... nothing that amazing about it, IMHO--once you study our occult anatomy a little...