SCEPCOP Forum

Why Evolution is mathematically impossible.

Why does Winston never actually want to debate his claims and beliefs?

I,m against the formula of Evolution what is being sold to us.Yeah,evolution can exist,but only if you manipulate it delibiteraly,because randomly genetic mutations cause more harm than good.and macroevolution still remains to be proven,I have seen some,which the scientists consider as evidence for it,the recent one being Tiktaalik but it may just be a species what have just died off.
so still clear transition from the fossil record has not been shown on any species and definitely humans.Homo Erectus is very different from modern humans.There is evidence for it,that they actually lived together in some time.Also in molecular biology,some scientists challenge evolution theory,because these systems in our cells just can,t be there by chance.
Also I challenge the uniformitarian theories of modern geology,I think that the whole chronology of the earth is so messed up,that we have to start researching all over again.

Well, some random mutations will be harmful, some not have much effect at all, and some will be beneficial. The harmful ones are less likely to reproduce. The beneficial ones more likely to reproduce. That's how it happens.

There is no such thing as macroevolution. Or rather, macroevolution is simply microevolution, with a lot of steps in between. Every single fossil is a transitional fossil. When a gap is filed, it simply creates two more gaps. We are lucky that we have any fossils at all, but understand that evolutionary thery does not depend on fossils, although they are certainly helpful.

Here is a helpful article for you to look at: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/ It's a worthwhile read and will take you through a lot of the scientific (and falsifiable) evidence in favour of macro-evolution.

Can you link to an article showing that some systems in our cells can't be there by chance? Is it in a peer reviewed journal? What does the scientific community say about it?

I don't know a lot about geology: how old do you think the earth is, and why do you think the current consensus is incorrect?