I posted a similar topic a while back on this. Here's my latest take, something I had to write in order for certain people to "get it:"
In other words, we "need" a "new" science when dealing with and testing phenomena such as remote viewing, not the ones we use for everything else (i.e.,medicine, biology, psychology, etc.), which is biased, but that's essentially what he said; and that if we were to employ this "new" science, remote viewing would most likely be disconfirmed/disproven, but until this "new" science is employed, remote viewing has been proven by the "current" science.
In other words, according to Wiseman, promissory materialism will prove him correct (i.e., that remote viewing is "false"), some day.