Maybe I need to explain why stories aren't all that useful.
I can think of three reasons why. Here goes.
1. You can't go back in time to observe what actually took place.
2. You can't do a forensic CSI type of investigation because there's never any evidence left over.
3. Interviewing the witnesses doesn't help either because it's after the incident. People will remember the incident inaccurately and will remember it based upon what they think they experienced.
Now has this made any impression upon you?
Not that much.I told,and repeat - it is up to individual what they will make of such stories.
A lot of things happened in the past. How many times people can be interviewed during event happening? Not many. Doesn't mean didn't
people will remember the incident inaccurately
People also have all chance to remember it accurately
. Regarding this story, note, that she herself would dismiss it shouldn't her friend be there and witnessing the same.
Anyway, I don't get You point. It you thing the story is not worth reading - good for you.Do You have any problem that others will read it and will think that maybe
be some trust in that? Are you that militant? Then again You confused the forum