Re: There needs to be a prize run by non-skeptics
Posted: 09 Jan 2011, 09:24What?
This is ridiculous, just the usual dumb ass skeptics in disguise.
SCEPCOP Forum
Scientific Committee to Evaluate PseudoSkeptic Criticism of the Paranormal
https://www.debunkingskeptics.com/forum/
There needs to be a prize run by non-skeptics
https://www.debunkingskeptics.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1592
Page 2 of 2
Posted: 09 Jan 2011, 09:24Re: There needs to be a prize run by non-skeptics
Posted: 09 Jan 2011, 10:53Re: There needs to be a prize run by non-skeptics
Posted: 09 Jan 2011, 10:58Re: There needs to be a prize run by non-skeptics
Posted: 09 Jan 2011, 11:32Will you stop sabotaging my proposed test with your constant lies!
You think of a question. Give me a few multi choice options. I tell you what question you were thinking of!
OBJECTIVE or SUBJECTIVE?
You think of a question. Give me a few multi choice options. I tell you what question you were thinking of!
OBJECTIVE or SUBJECTIVE?
Re: There needs to be a prize run by non-skeptics
Posted: 10 Jan 2011, 23:07I'm going to look up "MD5 Calculator" and check that out.
Re: There needs to be a prize run by non-skeptics
Posted: 10 Jan 2011, 23:15Re: There needs to be a prize run by non-skeptics
Posted: 10 Jan 2011, 23:32I don't know anything about it, but I don't think Mr. Adams is coming back, so I wouldn't worry too much about it now. I suspect he's set it up for himself that he presents his experiment in a way that he knows will not be acceptable to most people, and then he can sulk off confident that they are just afraid of him really showing his powers.
Re: There needs to be a prize run by non-skeptics
Posted: 10 Jan 2011, 23:40Yeah, well.... that's pretty much what I figured but since this "encrypting the questions" thing was my sticking point, I wanted to understand it.