SCEPCOP Forum

Your slavery bores you?

What is it about your slavery that is boring?

Is it because you as a trustee don't recognize the loss of ownership simply because money passes through your hands?

Ho Hum the trustee with his little legal title didn't notice the equitable title slip through his fingers oh dear!

Or is this a case of you being bored by everyone elses slavery?

Historically slavery has a fervent past, hardly boring at all, at least not to people with good moral ethics, something you don't know much about.

Any clever quips we can move on to since you are done spreading disinformation?

What is it called when people are bought and sold as a commodity or property? Slavery.

Perhaps people are not forced to work, but if there is no ownership or legal title of land to farm for food there is not much choice after that but to work considering the alternative, and that is called coercion not slavery. Anyone can point a gun at anyone and force them to work if they are fearful of death and that is not slavery.

Indentured servitude refers to the historical practice of contracting to work for a fixed period of time, typically three to seven years, in exchange for transportation, food, clothing, lodging and other necessities during the term of indenture.

Anyways a big thanks to scepcops for allowing this level of conspiracy to be debated even though it was obviously a one sided debate regarding honesty.

Cheers everyone *clink*

I don't blame you for not having followed probably the single most obscure and dry conversation on this forum!

4011 views, jumped from 3.5kish views to over 4k in 1 week, this thread was started in 2010, the math speaks volumes and seems to contradict Arouets statements, how odd!

To all the lurkers who take interest in good moral ethics the acts you want to read are that canadian ownership and control determination act, the state immunity act, the bank act and the trust and loans companies act, nevermind the disinfo go for the source.

i'm off to a real forum peace out! V

Yeah, it seems Cecil makes the rounds with his rather unique interpretation of Canadian law and doesn't really ever respond directly when others point out that he's wrong:

http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/vi ... 7&start=20