Why Do Conspiracies Have so Much Appeal?

[Arouet]

[Arouet]

[cecil1]

Still haven't figured out the difference between a business and a person yet Arouet? No?

Lemme know when it happens, bye =)

[Arouet]

[cecil1]

not yet eh? i'll keep checking, peace =)

[cecil1]

[Arouet]

oh, hey cecil, whatup?

[cecil1]

Coming back with nothing new is still running away. Like the pic?

[Arouet]

Ummm, I'm not sure what you are looking for. I don't have anything new for you. I've made my arguments. You have rejected them. The only thing I could do would be to make them all over again but I don't think anyone is interested in reading that. You could start reading the thread from the begining and you'll be able to see my position here.

What you might want to do is find a legal resource person that you trust and run your interpretation by them. I

As it stands I've explained to you where you are wrong. I know that others have as well. You are convinced of your opinion despite the fact that no-one else shares them. I'm not sure what else do say. While there are many topics that bear repetition this simply isn't one of them. You're fixated on an obscure piece of legislation related to canadian protectionist policies. You've completely misinterpreted them to imagine that they mean something fantastic involving people being "owned" by the state and being legal slaves. While certainly that would be much more interesting to talk about, the legislation simply doesn't establish what you think it does.

[cecil1]

[Arouet]

[Arouet]

Here, look:

“person”
« personne »
“person” means an individual, a corporation, a partnership, a trust, a government, an agency of government, a segregated fund within the meaning of the regulations and an organization that is prescribed as being a person or that falls into a class of organizations prescribed as being persons;

[cecil1]

[Arouet]

Honestly, I don't have anything left to say about this aspect. If you want to consider that a victory, then so be it.

Ok, let's give you the victory. Let's accept that this act establishes that the Canadian government can certify that it owns various human beings. Surely there must have been a whole host of human rights abuses that have come from this over the last 25 years or so. Maybe you could point to a few case studies for discussion.

[cecil1]