I'm fully aware of what Wiseman said.
I just selectively ignore it because he used "begs the question" incorrectly.
Begging the question is the following train of logic:
Psi does not exist
The evidence for psi is not good enough, because psi does not exist, so the data must be full of errors
Psi has not been proven to exist because the evidence doesn't support it.
The data for psi must contain errors, because psi has not been proven to exist.
Repeat.
The important point of the matter is, the community of skeptics simultaneously argue that 1) There is next to zero evidence for psi, and there is no way it exists 2) There is enough evidence to show that psi exists by any other measure of science, but there needs to be much more evidence before we will consider its existence seriously, because it would revolutionize the world of science.
The skeptical community needs to make up its damn mind. Either renounce the possibility of psi wholesale, or agree that it is plausible, as long as there continues to be evidenced produced for it.