There's no point in educating someone who dwells so deeply in willing ignorance (they must dig themselves out when so deeply entrenched in bad moral ethics) but I can point out that someone who does not understand how enlightenment works would not have the background that provides ethics to discern between an enlightened being and an unenlightened being, an enlightened society or an unenlightened society.
Any enlightened being can surely point out why slavery is immoral and not just semantically, but in principle, out of alignment with higher authority which is love.
We need law to respect the essence of higher authority within every living being but when that law is subverted into slavery and enforces evidentiary privileged rules for self-ownership to justify the rules of society it becomes not an enlightened use of the law but a self-serving, ego-gratifying, self-absorbed, hypnotic, manipulative control tool to use as a strawman for the morality that is lacking within such a structure of deceit, cowardice, and the very anti-thesis to higher authority which happens to be love.
Truth, love and reality all coincide with each other, so when I see a rule of society enforced as law that places men and women into an ownership structure/slavery via trickery and ommitting certain pertinent facts that would shed light on the nature of these acts the moral structure of those acts are non-existent as ethical.
Nothing up front need be hidden if the intent were to be honorable.
There is no point in further discussion with you Arouet as you are a happy slave content to be someone elses playtoy in life. This is not an insult but the basic reality of your situation. See you don't really understand higher authority so do not have a clue why slavery is immoral but I do like to explain a tiny portion of that understanding simply for the lurkers to see that there is a higher intelligence in this world than the egotistical mind. This intelligence was high enough to bend a lawyer against his will and had him admit intellectual defeat twice now even though sincerity is lacking, it is enough for the lurkers to see that it is possible to advocate the truth higher than untruths as the truth has no opposite.
The truth is point A and untruth is everything else which does not create a point B. The truth has no opposite.
P.S. Free hotdogs in my neck of the woods sunday!