NinjaPuppy wrote:Azrael - I know that being banned from this forum wouldn't bother you at all but please, no name calling. I removed the comment.
Please dont tug at my heart strings. I shall desist from such behaviour.
Thought Dial Dowsing Successful against 2,187 to 1 Odds !!!!Re: Thought Dial Dowsing Successful against 2,187 to 1 Odds !!!!
Please dont tug at my heart strings. I shall desist from such behaviour. I'm always very skeptical of any situation where someone's notability hinges on their connection to another notable person
Re: Thought Dial Dowsing Successful against 2,187 to 1 Odds !!!!Thank you and
Re: Thought Dial Dowsing Successful against 2,187 to 1 Odds !!!!shouldnt this thread be renamed to
Thought Dial Dowsing Successful against 1 to 1 odds? For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Thought Dial Dowsing Successful against 2,187 to 1 Odds !!!!
Something not right here. Superbowl was Feb 5th(UK time) Dark Truth radio show was Feb 15th so how did Ginette Lucas dowse anything in connection with Superbowl? I know psychics love to post dict(is that a word?) But really backing a claim up with a complete fabrication is just silly. I'm always very skeptical of any situation where someone's notability hinges on their connection to another notable person
Re: Thought Dial Dowsing Successful against 2,187 to 1 Odds !!!!What's interesting here Azrael is that the Professor refuses to answer simple questions that have been posted. This should be easy to clear up, but don't hold your breath waiting for an answer.
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: Thought Dial Dowsing Successful against 2,187 to 1 Odds !!!!
Well he is currently posting on magic talk forum,usual nonsense that Randi lied to him or about him. Ive lost track of the times he has been asked to prove that statement,never mind the hundreds of other nonsense statements. Seems you got him beat Nostradamus. Give Randi credit he sure gets 'em talking!! I'm always very skeptical of any situation where someone's notability hinges on their connection to another notable person
Re: Thought Dial Dowsing Successful against 2,187 to 1 Odds !!!!the professor hasnt come here in a while
the beauty of TiVo is that he gets to see Barney 24/7 which keeps him busy For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Thought Dial Dowsing Successful against 2,187 to 1 Odds !!!!Over at Magic Talk forum (only place he gets to post stuff unchallenged generally as its made up of all his buddies)Dave is crowing about Mysteries magazine apaprently running an article about the Thoght dial test. They seem to have overlooked th eobvious,and the fact hundreds predict lottery numbers(a much harder task) every week! But then I guess rational thinking isn't high on their agenda.
I'm always very skeptical of any situation where someone's notability hinges on their connection to another notable person
Re: Thought Dial Dowsing Successful against 2,187 to 1 Odds !!!!I emailed the genuiine professor of maths and statistics at Boston Mark Glickman(who The Professor claimed to have gotten such incredible odds) and asked him the obvious question: WHat are the odds of 5 people(as thats what Dave started his claim with)independently picking The COlts to win superbowl.His reply thus:
Just to clairfy:
Hmmm 1/2 isnt that 50/50? I'm always very skeptical of any situation where someone's notability hinges on their connection to another notable person
Re: Thought Dial Dowsing Successful against 2,187 to 1 Odds !!!!I notice that in Glickman's statement that the odds computed are for independent probabilities. I though that the test involved everyone openly announcing their decisions over a period of time. That's not independent. The multiplication formula only applies if one probability does not affect another probability. That's what independent means.
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Return to Divination / Fortune Telling Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|