National Geographic's 9/11 Conspiracy Program

[ProfWag]

I could have sworn someone mentioned this was going to be on, but I couldn't find it so I started a new thread.
I watched this last night with great interest. Essentially, this is my abbreviated critique.
Gage, Griffin, Jones, etc. came on saying the government was not telling us the truth. There is all sorts of evidence that it was a controlled demolition, that a plane didn't go into the Pentagon, etc. Griffin was even allowed to have "PhD" after his name without them saying it was in Theology so that was a plus for them (later in the show, they snuck it in, but my wife didn't notice it so I'd assume most of the viewers missed it also.)
Scientists came on and disputed everything they had to say with strong science and experiments. Purdue's computer model, explosive experts, etc. all showed that a controlled demolition not only could not have occured, but showed thre was no evidence of it at all. NONE.
Gage, et. al, all sat around a table and watched these experiments and then flatley denied that they were valid experiments. Griffin simply giggled and said that doesn't show anything. (Psych majors, you know what it means when people giggle in the middle of trying to think of a story when someone is presented with something they don't have an answer for.) They were shown that it could not have been explosives and they claimed thermite. They were shown that it could not have been thermite and they claimed it was "super thermite" that no one has access too. Yea, okay.
One thing they didn't get a chance to dispute is the fact (QP, yes I said "fact.") that if those buildings came down via a government coverup and a controlled demolition, there would have to be literally THOUSANDS of people who have knowledge of it and willing to cover it up. From demolition crews, to airplane pilots, to news media, to witnesses. That's simply just not possible for a tragedy of this magnitude. No, they weren't alowed to dispute that, but then again, we just would have gotten some more giggling.
Bottom line, they looked like bafoons up there. They "screamed" that there is a cover up, but offered zero evidence to back up there claim. None whatsoever. I almost felt sorry for those truthers. Those guys definitely have an agenda.

[quantumparanormal]

[ProfWag]

[quantumparanormal]

[ProfWag]

No need to read up on anything presented here. I am quite comfortable with my presentation's validity.
Using the Pentagon "fact" as an example, if a missle hit the Pentagon, the 23,000 employees (some of them friends and acquaintances of mine) who were there that day would have to have lied and covered up their knowledge that a plane did not hit the building that day, but rather it was a missle. They would have to have assisted in placing aircraft parts, bodies, broken light poles, and other evidence of an airplane in and around the crash site. If they did that, then a conspiracy is possible. If not, then the theory that a missile hit the building that day is not possible. From my knowledge garnered from friends and acquaintances who were there that day, a missile did not hit the pentagon but rather it was a large commercian airliner with passengers on board. Hence, it is a fact that thousands of people from the Pentagon, some of whom I have spoken with personally, would have had to be in on a conspiracy.
However, if you like to play word games, then that is fine. As I always say, readers can judge for themselves.

[quantumparanormal]

[ProfWag]

[quantumparanormal]

[ProfWag]

[quantumparanormal]

[quantumparanormal]

[ProfWag]

[quantumparanormal]

[ProfWag]

[quantumparanormal]