SCEPCOP Forum

Has Victor Zammit responded to this http://www.randi.org/jr/112301.html talking about his challenge ?
Has John Benneth responded to this http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/comment/benneth.htm ?

Have you guys on this site responded and refuted everyone who tried to refute this site and all your claims?

Do you refute the claims found on this site
http://www.thetrickbusters.com/ and http://www.thetrickbusters.com/node/32 ?

One more things this page claimed to have rebutted one of this sites essays found here
http://skeptico.blogs.com/skeptico/2008 ... uttal.html ? Do you refute these people?

google winston wu
get ready for what you will find

What makes the skeptics qualified in debunking the paranormal? Perhaps that is a better question. Michael Shermer for instance, uses tired arguments that are easy to debunk. So what makes him a media expert skeptic that the History Channel often consults? He's not smarter than anyone else here. You should be asking that.



"I couldnt have put it better myself "

Scecop,

Seriously you need to read up on SAEDA, TS/SCI, OPSEC, and NDA before posting junk from supposed classified materials. I think the irresponsibility you show in posting some of the stuff you post as fact is what leads people to ask about your credentials. It is fine to not have any credentials but at least be responsible and research articles before posting them as fact. You can still post them but don't post them with a heading stating 100% proof cause it just brings down your own credebility when you do that, and in my eyes and probably many others, places you barely a rung above Professor and highflyertoo. To give just 1 example of many is the one about Bob Lazer.

Scecop,

Okay again I point out your Bob Lazer topic or the Topic about Bin Laden being a CIA agent. One last time are you familiar with SAEDA, OPSEC, TS/SCI, NDA's, and being read on? If not then should you really comment on what is clasified material?